by Michael Hardy,
Federal Computer WeekDec. 11, 2004
A maker of touch-screen voting machines has agreed to pay $2.6 million to settle a lawsuit with California, company and state officials announced. Diebold officials reached the settlement agreement on behalf of its subsidiary, Diebold Election Systems.
Bill Lockyer, California's attorney general, said Diebold officials misled state leaders about the security and certification of its products to get payments from the state.
"There is no more fundamental right in our democracy than the right to vote and have your vote counted," Lockyer said in a statement. "In making false claims about its equipment, Diebold treated that right, and the taxpayers who bought its machines, cavalierly. This settlement holds Diebold accountable and helps ensure the future quality and security of its voting systems."
Diebold's name has become synonymous with electronic voting, even though several other companies also make touch-screen voting machines and vote tabulators. It was Diebold's code that computer scientists first raised security concerns about, and the company's chief executive officer, Walden O'Dell, has been an active Republican supporter who once promised in a fund-raising letter to deliver Ohio's electoral votes for President Bush. Consequently, e-voting skeptics have viewed the company with suspicion.
Diebold has had a rocky relationship with California officials, too. Earlier this year, Secretary of State Kevin Shelley decertified one of the company's products. Other Diebold machines caused trouble in some precincts in the primary election earlier this year and in the Nov. 2 general election. Some machines failed to start, forcing some polling places to open late or use paper ballots instead.
Under the proposed settlement, still pending final approval, Diebold must:
- Pay for the ballots and optical scanning equipment used during the Nov. 2 general election in Kern, San Joaquin and San Diego counties because the secretary of state had banned the use of the Diebold machines installed in those counties.
- Pay for the cost of storing electronic representations of each ballot cast on touch- screen voting units in Alameda, Plumas and Los Angeles counties.
- Pay for tamper-resistant tape and 750 expanded memory cards in Alameda County, at the request of county officials.
- Install upgraded touch-screen firmware in Alameda, Plumas and Los Angeles counties, and upgraded vote tabulation software in all counties using Diebold voting systems, at company expense.
- Replace hard-coded supervisor passwords with passwords that can be changed and provide the needed instructions and training to make sure that election officials know how to change the passwords.
- Replace hard-coded encryption keys with keys that county officials can program.
- Be prepared to reconfigure vote tabulation software for better security when requested by county officials or provide training so county officials can reconfigure the software themselves.
The settlement will prevent Diebold officials from connecting voting systems to certain networks and transmitting official election results via those networks, and it will forbid the downloading of any software or firmware via the networks.
Company officials also must provide documentation from independent federal testing authorities to California's secretary of state on demand, as well as information related to the development, testing, installation and operation of its voting systems.
Thomas Swidarski, senior vice president of strategic development and global marketing for Diebold, said the company settled the suit to avoid the distraction and cost of prolonged litigation and the company's prime goal is to continue doing business with California officials.
"While we believe Diebold has strong responses to the claims raised in the suit," he said in a statement, "we are primarily interested in building an effective and trusting relationship with California election officials so that we can work together in building election solutions that address the state's needs."
Published by
Federal Computer Week
| This material is copyrighted by its original publisher.
It is reprinted by Unknown News without permission, solely for purposes of criticism, comment, and news reporting, in accordance with the Fair Use Guidelines of copyright material under § 107 of U.S.C. Title 17:
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include --
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors. |
|
|
There's much more than this at Unknown News.
|
Latest related reports from our archives:
Dec. 13, 2004:
Ohio vote fraud battle heats up
by Katherine Yurica, Axis of Logic
Dec. 13, 2004:
Startling new revelations highlight rare Congressional hearings on Ohio vote
Dec. 12, 2004:
20 amazing facts about voting in the USA
Dec. 12, 2004:
Ohio absentee vote inflated
Dec. 12, 2004:
Blackwell's "locked-down" Ohio
poll records left in unlocked building
Dec. 11, 2004:
Complete original exit polls from 2004 election
Dec. 11, 2004:
Ohio election investigation thwarted
by surprise Blackwell orderExcerpt: On Friday December 10 two certified volunteers for the Ohio Recount team assigned to Greene County were in process recording voting information from minority precincts in Greene County, and were stopped mid-count by a surprise order from Secretary of State Blackwell’s office. The Director Board of Elections stated that “all voter records for the state of Ohio were “locked-down,” and now they are not considered public records.”
Dec. 10, 2004:
Zogby insists polls were "very,
very good, extremely accurate"
|
. Professor says vote numbers don't add up
. Congressman wants 'raw' exit poll data
. Who did voters pick on Nov. 2?
In some cases, we'll never know
. Former Congressman jailed
for confronting Blackwell
. Ohio Supreme Court won’t block certification
. Some voters hold outhope for Kerry victory
. Ohio counties dealing differently
with Kerry recount requests
. FBI, Congressional staffers curious about
self-described vote fraud programmer
|
Dec. 10, 2004:
Blackwell locks out recount volunteers,
claims voter records not public documents
Dec. 10, 2004:
Uncounted votes in Ohio's Montgomery County
Dec. 9, 2004:
Trouble counting votes in Ohio
Dec. 7, 2004:
Florida e-vote study debunked by statisticians
Dec. 7, 2004:
As questions keep coming,
Ohio certifies its vote count
|
. New round of challenges in Ohio vote
. Kerry team finally, halfheartedly joins Ohio recount fight
. LePore served with lawsuit at elections meeting
. Greens, Libertarians seek recounts in New Mexico, Nevada
|
Dec. 7, 2004:
Nation editor spars with
reporter over election questions
Why, it's David Corn -- who also
dismissed questions about September 11
Dec. 7, 2004:
Evidence dramatically raises
suspicion of election tampering
"The bigger the prize, the bigger the discrepancy"
Nov. 6, 2004:
Democrats launch investigation
of voting problems in Ohio
Dec. 6, 2004:
Democratic Underground bars
Black Box Voting's Harris
Dec. 5, 2004:
Evidence of fraud in the 2004
U.S. Presidential election: A reader
Dec. 5, 2004:
Dec. 4, 2004:
Slow-rolling democracy in Ohio
by Robert Parrt, Consortium News
Dec. 3, 2004:
News editors poo-poo election fraud rumors
Dec. 3, 2004:
FBI refuses to accept complaint
alleging Ohio vote fraudExcerpt: In a November 30 article titled "Nearly a Month Later, Ohio Fight Goes On," detailing the controversy in Ohio over the results of the November 2 election, the Associated Press correctly identified J. Kenneth Blackwell -- who, as Ohio's secretary of state, oversees the election process -- as "a co-chairman of Bush's re-election campaign in Ohio." But two large news organizations, FOXNews.com and the Chicago Sun-Times, omitted that reference from their versions of the story.
Dec. 1, 2004:
Major media hints at nationwide voting problems
Dec. 1, 2004:
Voters to challenge Ohio election
Dec. 1, 2004:
FOXNews.com, Chicago Sun-Times
deleted connection between Ohio official,
Bush campaign from AP story
Nov. 30 and Dec. 1, 2004:
Something's fishy in Ohio
by Jesse Jackson, syndicated columnist
and Jackson column draws heat
from Ohio Secretary of State's Office
Nov. 30, 2004:
BlackBoxVoting sues Palm Beach County
Nov. 30, 2004:
Where there's smoke, there's fire
Electronic voting and the legitimacy
of the 2004 Presidential election
Nov. 30, 2004:
People for the American Way sues to have Ohio provisional ballots counted
|
. Nearly a month later, fight over Ohio count goes on
(with comments by Helen & Harry Highwater)
. Jesse Jackson seeks voting probe
. More questions raised about Ohio vote
. Judge says Ohio recount must wait
until after election is certified
. Florida group sues over election results
. Kerry picks up 1,070 more votes in Ohio
. Commission says voting problems were widespread
. Concerned locals push for presidential election fraud probe |
Nov. 29, 2004:
How to take back a stolen election
by Thom Hartmann, Common Dreams
Nov. 26, 2004:
Odds for red shift in 16 states:
One out of 4.5 billion
Nov. 26, 2004:
Grass-roots movement tries to trick CNN
into practicing journalism in Ohio
Nov. 25, 2004
New Ohio voter transcripts feed floodtide of doubt about Republican election manipulation
Nov. 24, 2004:
US offers hypocritical response
on Ukraine election
# with comments by 100 Watts and H&HH
Nov. 23, 2004:
Greens, Libertarians sue to stop
stonewalling on Ohio recount
|
. Lawsuit challenges
Nevada’s Republican electors
. Ohio Finds at least 2,600 ballots counted twice
. Lingering doubts about 2004 election |
Nov. 22, 2004:
Widespread election fraud in Cleveland?
Nov. 21, 2004:
Help wanted: Last chance to count Nevada vote
Nov. 18, 2004:
Research team sounds
'smoke alarm' for Florida e-vote count
Nov. 18, 2004:
"Something is definitely wrong," says Zogby
Nov. 18, 2004
Voting machines count backwards in Oklahoma
Nov. 17, 2004:
Consistant swing from exit polls
to Bush vote unexplained
Nov. 17, 2004:
Minority precincts were deliberately shortchanged on voting equipment
Many people waited hours to vote ...
while many more gave up and left
Nov. 16, 2004:
Ohio vote to be recounted
Greens and Libertarians fund re-count together
# with comments by Angry Annie
Nov. 16, 2004:
While the news networks were covering Scott Peterson's trial ...
|
. Election stolen, group suspects
. Hackers rigging voting machines a real possibility
. Complaints of election theft quickly, efficiently dismissed (with comments by H&HH)
. Wacky turnout totals just another glitch
. Computer glitch elects wrong candidate in Indiana
. Minnesotans kicked off voter registration lists are still asking why
. Nader seeks limited recount of optical-scan vote in New Hampshire
. Worst voter error is apathy toward irregularities |
Nov. 16, 2004:
What can we do about the stolen election?
by Atomicktom and Helen & Harry Highwater, Unknown News
Nov. 12, 2004:
Major bugs found in Diebold vote systems
Nov. 11, 2004:
Kerry lawyers eye Ohio recounts
but insist effort isn't aimed at challenging results
Nov. 11, 2004:
Republican Party wants to end exit polls
Nov. 11, 2004:
Green, Libertarian candidates
demand Ohio recount
Nov. 10, 2004:
Florida e-vote fraud? Unlikely
Nov. 9, 2004:
Bush's 'incredible' vote tallies
Nov. 8, 2004:
The e-vote factor:
Kerry conceded but did he really lose?
Nov. 8, 2004:
Media blackout on vote fraud allegations
Nov. 7, 2004:
With 638 votes cast, Bush leads 4,258 to 260
... and other amusing anecdotes
from the stolen election of 2004
|
. Absentee votes draw Florida eye
. Kerry leads in Ohio exit polling
. Newspaper denied access at polls
. Foreign monitors 'barred' from US polls
. Journalist beaten, arrested outside Florida polling place for violating secret rule
. Countless other frauds occurred ...
. Defective software 'lost' votes
|
Nov. 6, 2004:
Evidence mounts that the vote
may have been hacked
Nov. 5, 2004:
Should America trust the results of the election?
Editorial, The Washington DispatchExcerpt: Without question, the evidence presented thus far should raise suspicion among honest individuals. While maintaining a calm and reasonable demeanor, the results of the Novermber 2nd election should be fully investigated simply for the sake of the nation and our future confidence in the democratic process.
Nov. 5, 2004:
Something amiss in Ohio
Nov. 4, 2004:
Was the Ohio election honest and fair?
Press release, Progressive NewswireExcerpt: Ohio State Senator Teresa Fedor said today: "There was trouble with our elections in Ohio at every stage. It's been a battle getting people registered to vote, getting to the ballot on voting day and getting that vote to count. There is a pattern of voter suppression; that's why I called for [Ohio Secretary of State] Blackwell's resignation more than a month ago. Blackwell, while claiming to run an unbiased elections process, was also the co-chair of the Bush-Cheney campaign in Ohio.
Nov. 4, 2004:
First of all, this election was definitely rigged
by Mark Crispin Miller, Salon
Nov. 4, 2004:
States with electronic voting machines
gave Bush mysterious 5% advantage
Nov. 4, 2004:
More votes than voters?
Nov. 4, 2004:
Kerry won. Here's the facts.
Nov. 4, 2004:
Evidence of fraud is indisputable
... but there is no accountability
Nov. 4, 2004:
4,000+ votes vanish in one countyExcerpt: The county's technical consultants contacted UniLect Corp., the manufacturer of Carteret County's electronic voting system, had given misinformation about how many votes the system can store.
The county was told its units could store up to 10,500 votes when, in fact, the limit is 3,005 votes.
Nov. 4, 2004:
Computer glitch still baffles county clerk
Nov. 4, 2004:
Were the absentee ballots lost or stolen?
Either way, it's a crime.
Nov. 3, 2004:
Photo shows voter fraud in Ohio?
Nov. 3, 2004:
Florida numbers don't add up
Nov. 3, 2004:
America is screwed: Election stolen againExcerpt: In most states, the returns were pretty much as predicted by the last polls. Florida seems the odd exception -- the last polls were for Kerry, 49-44%, but the returns are running 52-47 Bush.
So in just one day -- and in just one state -- Bush went from five points down to five points ahead?
Nov. 3, 2004:
All exit polls matched results
... except Ohio, Florida
Nov. 3, 2004:
Graph:
Exit polls vs. E-vote tallies
Nov. 3, 2004:
Where did Bush get
8,000,000 new voters?Statistical analysis:
Bush's 8 million
new votes found
Nov. 3, 2004:
Votes lost in cyberspace
Nov. 3, 2004:
Presidential votes miscast on
e-voting machines throughout the country
Nov. 3, 2004:
CNN just changed their Ohio exit poll page
Nov. 2, 2004:
BlackBoxVoting files fleet of FOIA requestsExcerpt: At 8:30 p.m. Election Night, Black Box Voting blanketed the U.S. with the first in a series of public records requests, to obtain internal computer logs and other documents from 3,000 individual counties and townships. Networks called the election before anyone bothered to perform even the most rudimentary audit.
... Among the first requests sent to counties (with all kinds of voting systems -- optical scan, touch-screen, and punch card) is a formal records request for internal audit logs, polling place results slips, modem transmission logs, and computer trouble slips.
An earlier FOIA is more sensitive, and has not been disclosed here. We will notify you as soon as we can go public with it.
Nov. 2, 2004:
Group tallies more than 1,100 e-voting glitches
Nov. 2, 2004:
Watchdogs spot e-vote glitches
Nov. 1, 2004:
One million Kerry votes
stolen before election day
Oct. 28, 2004:
58,000 absentee ballots lost in Florida
Oct. 26, 2004:
E-voting companies reveal some software to feds
# with comments by CactusPat
Oct. 26, 2004:
New Florida vote scandal feared
by Greg Palast, BBC News
Oct. 22, 2004:
Some early voters say
machines mark incorrect choices
Oct. 20, 2004:
Republican-backed group allegedly involved
in Pennsylvania vote registration fraud
# with comments by CactusPat and H&HH
Oct. 16, 2004:
Florida's Bush ignored advice to
'pull the plug' on flawed felon voter list
Oct. 12, 2004:
Republican-backed group allegedly involved
in vote registration fraud in Nevada and Oregon- Republicans phone voters to discourage Democrats' voting
Oct. 9, 2004:
Republican
dirty tricks in Ohio
Sept. 8, 2004:
November surprise: Electronic voting machines add uncertainty to close election race
Aug. 30, 2004:
Florida fixed again? Absentee ballots go AWOL
Excerpt: Although 37,000 citizens have requested absentee ballots, Supervisor of Elections Theresa LePore says she'd only received 22,000 when she began the count. Where are the others? Don't ask: though she posts the names of requesters, she won't release the list of those who have voted, an eyebrow-raising deviation from standard procedure.
Aug. 26, 2004:
Diebold central tabulator
contains stunning security holeExcerpt: By entering a 2-digit code in a hidden location, a second set of votes is created. This set of votes can be changed, so that it no longer matches the correct votes. The voting system will then read the totals from the bogus vote set. It takes only seconds to change the votes, and to date not a single location in the U.S. has implemented security measures to fully mitigate the risks.
This program is not "stupidity" or sloppiness. It was designed and tested over a series of a dozen version adjustments.
Public officials: If you are in a county that uses GEMS 1.18.18, GEMS 1.18.19, or GEMS 1.18.23, your secretary or state may not have told you about this. You're the one who'll be blamed if your election is tampered with.
Aug. 23, 2004:
Vote count at mercy of clandestine testing
Aug. 16, 2004:
Is Florida facing a new electoral crisis?
by Linda McQuaig, The Toronto StarExcerpt: Concerns about the lack of a paper trail have prompted some states to ban the machines in the November election. But Jeb Bush has brushed aside such concerns, refusing to even allow independent audits of the machines in Florida.
Aug. 6, 2004:
Government makes sure soldiers' votes count (the rest of us are on our own)
# with comments by Madeline Zane
Aug. 4, 2004:
Computerized voting systems proven insecure
Aug. 3, 2004:
A new variation on voter fraudExcerpt: Today, around lunchtime, I went with my parents to the polls to vote in our primary election. When I got there, I found that I had somehow been removed from the books, and hence could not vote.
July 25, 2004:
New citizens in Florida are
unknowingly registered as Republicans
July 16, 2004:
A bigger threat to November's election
than any terrorists' attack
by Madeline Zane, Unknown News
June 20, 2004:
Stage set for repeat of 2000 presidential vote fraud
May 19, 2004:
Feds threaten subpenna against activist for honest vote counts
May 18, 2004:
The people's paper trail
by Carlos Pecciotto Jr., Unknown News
May 6, 2004:
Officials warn against
receipts for electronic ballots
# with comments by Phil
April 30, 2004:
California Secretary of State
bans electronic voting
April 28, 2004:
Two companies & two brothers will count 80% of U.S. ballots
April 23, 2004:
Diebold may face criminal charges
April 22, 2004:
Diebold apologizes for
disenfranchising California voters
April 13, 2004:
E-voting probe finds no reason for Diebold glitches
March 14, 2004:
Designer of verified vote system
dies in unlucky accident
March 4, 2004:
A deafening silence as democracy expires
Feb. 24, 2004:
Diebold, electronic voting and
the vast right-wing conspiracy
Feb. 15, 2004:
Would you like a receipt with that election?
Technologists advocate a paper trail
for electronic voting machines
Feb. 6, 2004:
Michigan plans internet vote
despite hacking risks
Feb. 6, 2004:
Company lied about voting machine's reliability
Jan. 30, 2004:
This week in vote fraud
Jan. 20, 2004:
Company with worst e-voting security record produces machines with wireless capability
Jan. 17, 2004:
This week in U.S. election fraud
Dec. 17, 2003:
Yeah, let's put Diebold in charge of elections
Dec. 14, 2003:
Vote system provides receipt, verification that your vote was counted
Dec. 2, 2003:
Diebold backs off legal intimidation
Nov. 10, 2003:
More election machine problems
Nov. 6, 2003:
Electronic voting machines cause problems nationwide
Nov. 4, 2003:
Diebold sued over cease-and-desist tactics
Nov. 3, 2003:
New York Times briefly awakens from long nap, notes controversy, goes back to sleep
Nov. 3, 2003:
When votes don't count
by Madeline Zane, Unknown News
Oct. 24, 2003:
Diebold memos disclose
Florida 2000 e-voting fraudBackground information :
Election 2000: Our final tally
Oct. 22, 2003:
Electronic Frontier Foundation
to Diebold: Bite me
Oct. 14, 2003:
The hand that counts the ballots ...
Oct. 13, 2003:
Did Diebold patch Georgia election?Excerpt: Republican candidate Sonny Perdue managed to unseat Democratic incumbent Roy Barnes with only 51 percent of the vote. It was the first time an incumbent governor had not won his second term since Georgia law allowed back-to-back terms in 1978.
Sept. 24, 2003:
Diebold feels the heat,
sends out attack lawyers
Sept. 23, 2003
Italian Diebold memo website, BlackBoxVoting.org shut down
Company claims hyperlinks are
'illegally' linked to leaked memos
Sept. 19, 2003
Democracy's vanishing act
by Chris Floyd, The Moscow [Russia] Times
Sept. 17, 2003:
Diebold's vote-tally software -- Security review instructions# This is a page with instructions on downloading & using Diebold's GEMS program. It's the REAL Diebold program, with step by step instructions on how to hack into it and alter the vote counts. Altering the vote counts is child's play for those who have Microsoft Access, a part of Microsoft Office Suite, the most common business application software package available. =Joe F.=
Sept. 12, 2003
Diebold confirms U.S. vote vulnerabilities
Sept. 11, 2003
Strange case of an election tally that
appears to have popped up on
the Internet hours before polls closed
Sept. 3, 2003:
Bush's "solution" to vote fraud funds massive switch to insecure computerized voting systemsExcerpt: It seems fitting that a president who was brought into office because of a scandalous election would enact a law to overhaul the electoral process to make it easier for people to choose their leaders the second time around.
But that's not what the Omnibus Appropriations Bill, signed into law by President Bush in October 2002, will do. Instead, the law will force most states to switch from paper balloting to a fully computerized system -- one that is currently rife with programming flaws and is incapable of being audited -- that could call into question the legitimacy of future local and national elections and put the wrong candidates into office.
Aug. 28, 2003
President of voting machine company
says he's "committed" to Bush re-election
Aug. 26, 2003:
Voting industry insiders hold secret meeting to hire PR firm to sell electronic voting to public
Aug. 8, 2003
How George W. Bush won
the 2004 presidential election
by Sandeep S. Atwal, Infernal Press
Aug. 7, 2003
New security woes for computer-voting firm
Aug. 5, 2003
Lawsuit to block voting
machines gains momentum
Aug. 1, 2003
Experimental web program
opens voting to overseas military
July 30, 2003:
Electronic voting rife with problemsTheft of your vote is just a chip away
July 24, 2003:
Computerized voting open
to easy fraud, says study
July 24, 2003:
Original study:
Analysis of an electronic voting system| REQUIRES ADOBE ACROBAT READER |
July 8, 2003
The 'walk right in, sit right down, and compose your own tally' vote counting system
by Bev Harris, Scoop
"When I found that Diebold Election Systems had been storing 40,000 of its files on an open web site, an obscure site, never revealed to public interest groups, but generally known among election industry insiders, and available to any hacker with a laptop, I looked at the files. Having a so-called security-conscious voting machine manufacturer store sensitive files on an unprotected public web site, allowing anonymous access, was bad enough, but when I saw what was in the files my hair turned gray. Really. It did.
"The contents of these files amounted to a virtual handbook for vote-tampering: They contained diagrams of remote communications setups, passwords, encryption keys, source code, user manuals, testing protocols, and simulators, as well as files loaded with votes and voting machine software."
Jan. 31, 2003:
How Chuck Hagel stole a seat in the Senate
Nov. 12, 2002:
Three Republicans in one Texas county each win election by 18,181 vote margin
May 11, 2001:
Election 2000: Our final tallyFAQ about our tally
Latest related reports from our archives:
|
|
|
