No food drops for New Orleans
|
by Jeff Schogol, Stars & Stripes
Sept. 3, 2005 [Day 6]
ARLINGTON, Va. -- Authorities are avoiding airdropping provisions into New Orleans -- the traditional way of supplying disaster victims -- out of fear of sparking riots, a state official said.
While the military has used helicopters to drop provisions to some stranded in New Orleans, authorities have not launched the massive supply airdrops seen in Afghanistan at the beginning of Operation Enduring Freedom.
Several C-130 Hercules aircraft are stationed at Little Rock Air Force Base, but authorities have not ordered them to drop supplies to flood victims, Arkansas Air National Guard officials said.
Airdropping supplies could actually worsen the situation, said Army National Guard Lt. Kevin Cowan, with the state Office of Emergency Preparedness.
“Just like Afghanistan, you drop food, it creates chaos,” Cowan said.
He said authorities are looking for a more controlled way to get badly need food and other supplies to people in the hurricane-ravaged region who need it.
“We’re trying to logistically to plan how to get food the best way,” Cowan said. “But as of right now, airdrops are not part of the plan.”
He said dropping supplies from the air is an option that is still available, but “I don’t think that is high on the priority list.”
Officials at U.S. Northern Command and Task Force Katrina could not be reached in time for publication Friday.
Little Rock Air Force Base is home to about 80 C-130s, but many cannot be flown because of wing cracks, wrote a spokesman for the 314th Air Wing in an e-mail.
On Friday, four C-130s from Little Rock Air Force Base were expected to bring water and MREs to the flood region and to evacuate refugees, wrote Air National Guard Capt. David Faggard.
The Arkansas National Guard is using 10 C-130s and 15 helicopters to bring troops and supplies to the flood region, said a National Guard spokeswoman.
Should authorities order an airdrop, “we are certainly ready if that’s what they need us for,” said Air National Guard Capt. Kristine Munn.
From October to December 2001, the Air Force dropped 2.5 million individual rations in Afghanistan using C-17 Globemaster aircraft based in Ramstein, Germany.
As originally published
There's much more than this at Unknown News.
|
|
Commentary:
Sweet Jesus, they're letting people starve and dehydrate, for fear that they might misbehave?
Airdrops are "the traditional way of supplying disaster victims"; why not this time? Why not for these victims?
The military was sent into the city yesterday -- not to rescue people, but for "combat operations" ... against people being deprived food and water?
If this is FEMA's idea of "rescue," everyone in charge at FEMA needs to be "rescued," as soon as possible.
| | |
“We’re trying to logistically to plan how to get food the best way,” Cowan said. “But as of right now, airdrops are not part of the plan.”
|
|
| |
"As of right now," while people haven't had food or fresh water for six days, dropping food and water is not part of the plan.
I'm sure FEMA will come up with a different way to feed the starving. They just need a few days to think it over ... and meanwhile, a few thousand more people can die.
This is murder. This is murder-by-so-called-rescue.
All I ask, when this hell is finally ended, is that the trials of every official who made such decisions be broadcast live on national TV. I want the trials to be fair, and the sentences very, very harsh.
=H&HH=
|
|
Say it with a bumper sticker
$3 each, or two for $5
| Republished material is copyrighted by its original publisher.
It is reprinted by Unknown News without permission, solely for purposes of criticism, comment, and news reporting, in accordance with the Fair Use Guidelines of copyright material under § 107 of U.S.C. Title 17:
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include --
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors. |
|
|
|
