| |
|
9/11 and tooty-fruity conspiracy theories
I am discouraged to see revolutionary fervor focused upon the Bush regime... when our problems are far beyond them.
Friends, the entire system must be destroyed or we will perish. Please understand what is going on here. Its not a rogue presidency problem. He has full blessing to play his part.
The only meaningful issue is that the earth population is to be culled to 500 million. Bush is simply part of the mind control drama. Even now the USA is being destroyed intentionally. Even now the air is
|
|
|
When you open a discussion of 9/11 with a plot to depopulate the world, with our air, food, and minds being poisoned, with the conspiracy to kill JFK, the Council on Foreign Relations, Skull & Bones, Bilderbergs, secret societies, a plan to destroy U.S. sovereignty, the North American Union, and the devaluation of the dollar, not a lot of people are going to keep listening.
|
|
|
|
being poisoned (Look up sometime) The food is poisoned. The minds are being turned to mush. Many are starting to become sick. Soon the economy will drop out and many will starve.
All planned.
And yes, they do only understand force. But force means violence -- not public protest. Force means physical restraint and harm, often lethal.
JFK (bless his heart) warned America, before he died, of a "Monolithic Conspiracy". We should consider exactly what he meant and how that bodes for the present... considering that was decades ago and much more work has been done by now.
Even the speaker of the house, Pelosi, is a CFR member. Do you think that under any circumstances, such a vile traitor will listen to mobs of people? "Impeachment is off the table". They don't care. They know you will cower to the police when push comes to shove.
Concentration camps have been erected around the USA. That's where protesters will go in the wake of the next terrorist attack. Of course it will be an inside job. Try telling that to the throngs of idiots who worship authority.
They worked for decades to prepare the population for this: Make them stupid and compliant. For example, Chronic Fatigue is one of their tools.
Congress has sit by and let Bush do all he has done. They are in on it, mark my words.
God save the innocent. Arm yourselves.
James B.
| |
I say this with respect, sir, because I'm always aware that the conclusions I've reached will appear tooti-fruiti to many, many others.
But that said, there's tooti-fruitiness in your note -- all the allusions to destroying the system, culling the earth's population, chemtrails, the Council on Foreign Relations, etc. Of course, when anyone with eyeballs and a brain can see that most political leaders are corrupt, the people in charge are poorly-closeted totalitarians, and the media isn't reporting the news, it's a natural human tendency to connect the dots in our minds, which can and often does lead otherwise intelligent people to reach tooti-fruitti conclusions.
I certainly agree that Bush is not the beginning and end of the problem. He is only the problem's most visible public spokesman. Bringing down the Bush administration wouldn't solve the problems, or end the battle. The battle for freedom will be endless, and the battle is only won occasionally and temporarily.
But the Bush administration is an appropriate focal point for activists. Bringing down the Bush administration would greatly weaken the apparatus that operates Bush and his cohorts, and anything that weakens that un-seen apparatus weakens the American public's pre-programmed respect for authority, and anything that does that is a good thing.
So I'd say, certainly, Bush is not the problem. But removing the Bush administration is a big part of the solution.
Helen & Harry
| |
Thanks so much for your reply. I realize what I said seems that way. But I have spent some great time looking into it. What can I say, the way things "seem" is only a matter of mental paradigm, which is to say fixed ideas.
I can show you evidence of public record for what I say. It is all there for you to see. Previously hidden in a sea of information. But most people won't bother and this will be our downfall. It makes me truly sad to see the clamor over Bush as though liberation lies behind that door. When I know that nothing of the sort is true. In fact, getting rid of Bush will calm the nation and allow plans to roll forward. This is how they operate, in cycles. Our anger is managed.
For example, are you aware of the truth of 911? It was an attack from within. This view is held by hundreds of scholars and scientists. Former members of the Bush administration even the former head of Star Wars research under Reagan share this view.
Liisten to the words of John F Kennedy. He stated that our enemy was a hidden group, a monolithic conspiracy of the powerful of the world.
Kennedy's warning to the Americans
He condemns secret societies as a danger. And yet here are Bush and Kerry both admitting membership in the Skull And Bones secret society:
Skull and Bones the order of death
And Cheney was secretly a member of the CFR:
Cheney CFR membership undisclosed
Note also that Nancy Pelosi is a CFR member And this secrecy includes the most powerful of the world:
Bilderberg Meeting
And they plan to destroy US sovereignty:
Lou Dobbs on the North American Union
Want to know why the dollar is being destroyed? To make way for the Amero:
CNBC
I am not an angry anarchist. I am upset that the majority of truth seekers (all of whom I love) are being bamboozled and there is little or nothing I can say to cut through the layers of programming.
There was a British doctor who murdered hundreds of people a few years back. It took years to catch him, because the very idea was "tooty-fruity".
Best wishes and long life,
James B.
| |
Best wishes right back at you, and I hope you'll take what follows as it's intended --
as a suggestion, not an insult.
I know enough about September 11, 2001 to know that there's easily, obviously enough evidence to call into question numerous aspects of the official story, along with the character and integrity of government officials who stonewalled the investigation so successfully they made the word 'investigation' a bit of a stretch. I know enough about 9/11 to know that there's a lot I don't know, and an investigation is needed.
But you say you know "the truth of 911." You know that it was an attack from within, you state this as an absolute, and you say, "I can show you evidence of public record for what I say" ... and then you change the subject.
A lot of people's eyes glaze over when
|
|
|
someone brings up a long list of miles-out-of-the-ordinary ideas, all at once. That's why, when I want strangers to hear my ideas about 9/11, I discuss 9/11.
When you open a discussion of 9/11 with a plot to depopulate the world, with our air, food, and minds being poisoned, with the conspiracy to kill JFK, the Council on Foreign Relations, Skull & Bones, Bilderbergs, secret societies, a plan to destroy U.S. sovereignty, the North American Union, and the devaluation of the dollar, not a lot of people are going to keep listening. And as cordially as possible, you've lost me.
Sadly, presenting an ever-expanding conspiracy theory only adds to the public perception that 'serious' people don't question the official story of 9/11. And that perception, of course, makes it more and more difficult to reach serious people with the very serious questions of 9/11.
You mention the grisly case of Dr Harold Shipman, who killed hundreds by lethal injection before being arrested, tried, and imprisoned. Please ponder this, sir: What if the witnesses who presented evidence against Shipman had spoken also of Bilderbergs and mind control? What if they'd told investigators that a doctor was killing people ... and that they knew who really sank the Titanic? Nobody would have taken such witnesses seriously, and I rather doubt Dr Shipman would ever have been caught.
I trust you see my point?
Helen & Harry
| |
Thanks again. I'm not selling anything. If people say: "Well, it's all too
crazy for me," it's their loss. What's true is true and perception or
acceptance changes nothing except our chances. Let us not confuse the
message with the messenger.
I am planning on bugging out of here anyway. Just trying to help if I can.
If not, I'll see everyone on the other side.
But thanks for the discourse.
James B.
ps: I hope you will look into the subjects I mentioned. I have a fairly good
list of news videos I compiled. If you like I will pass it on to you. It
paints a fairly clear picture. Almost all are major news sources.
| |
You're inviting me across a chasm I've peered at, but never jumped over. I've read a little about most of the subjects you've suggested, an hour at a time once in a while when there's time to spare. Usually my interest is drained after that first hour, so I've never immersed myself, probably never will.
I don't doubt there are plans and players we know little or nothing about engaged in conspiracies against life and liberty. Our work, though, is focused on conspiracies proven, not theorized -- tyrants ruling nations, slaughters that aren't secrets, and corporations, criminals, and other monsters we can see.
I do wish you well, kind sir. I appreciate your invitation, and appreciate even more the conversation conducted, hopefully, without aspersions.
| |
|
Our front page is free from nudity and profanity, but interior pages and external links may not be safe for work, and you may be shocked, offended, or in trouble with your boss. A link doesn't imply that we agree with every sentence and every sentiment on every site we link to. We use our noggins, and suggest you use yours.
Anything sent to Unknown News may be published. If you don't want it published, say so plainly. Of course, we publish all incoming hate mail.
Unknown News is more fun and more informative with your participation, so please don't be shy. Consider yourself invited to speak your mind.
|
Because we respect peoples' privacy, we do not keep records of friends' and contributors' contact information. This means we can't forward private communications between readers and writers, but we always welcome dialogue for publication.
When we publish incoming emails, we usually edit out the sender's last name, email address, or anything else that would tend to uniquely identify the author (if we slip up, please let us know). But if your email is unambiguously intended only to annoy, insult, or threaten us, we'll publish all the details, and leave it on-line forever.
We're especially interested in hearing and considering different perspectives. All we ask is that you conduct yourself sanely and civilly. For the most productive dialogue, it helps if you'll cite a specific article or concept we've gotten wrong.
You can contact Helen & Harry at <newsuneed at yahoo.com>. If that address ever fails, our back-up email address is <unknownnews at inbox.com>.
But please, don't email us unless you're really and truly, honestly, actually trying to send the publishers of News a communication you're not sending to anyone or everyone else.
Please don't send attachments or other cr*p we don't want.
If you're trying to reach us but getting no reply, it's probably because you've sent us cr*p we don't want, so we're filtering your emails into the trash, unopened and unread.
If you'd like to have your email address unblocked, simply send a sincere apology (from an un-blocked email address).
|
| |
We sell our own progressive bumper stickers:
pro-peace, anti-Bush,
pro-freedom,
anti-Republican
stickers you won't find anywhere else.
bumper stickers
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
