Bush's 'war on terror' phrase helps terrorists
|
The Guardian April 17, 2007
President George Bush's "war on terror" rhetoric has strengthened terrorist groups by helping them to create a shared identity, the British Development Secretary, Hilary Benn, warned on Monday.
The Foreign Office reportedly asked politicians and diplomats to drop the phrase last year. But Benn's open criticism surprised many observers, and critics suggested he might be attempting to woo grassroots Labour activists in his bid for the party's deputy leadership -- an accusation he later described as "unworthy".
"In the UK, we do not use the phrase 'war on terror' because we can't win by military means alone, and because this isn't us against one organized enemy with a clear identity and a coherent set of objectives," he told a meeting in New York organized by the Center on International Cooperation.
|
|
Commentary by Helen & Harry:
It's hard to say this without sounding like it's hyperbole, especially with all the non-stop coverage American media gives "the war on terror," but ...
There is no war on terror.
There are endless occupations of foreign nations, endless explosions, gunfights, and war, endless death of American soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines, and of course plenty of death for innocent civilians in these occupied nations, but in all the reasons offered for this, the so-called "war on terror," there's nothing that isn't just plain propaganda.
Helen & Harry
|
|
|
"It is the vast majority of the people in the world -- of all nationalities and faiths -- against a small number of loose, shifting and disparate groups who have relatively little in common apart from their identification with others who share their distorted view of the world and their idea of being part of something bigger. What these groups want is to force their individual and narrow values on others without dialogue, without debate, through violence. And by letting them feel part of something bigger, we give them strength."
He said "hard power" was not enough: "It can certainly win the battle, but without soft power we cannot win the war that will deliver better governance, sustainable peace and lasting prosperity."
British Prime Minister Tony Blair's spokesperson said he was unsure when the prime minister had last used the term, adding: "We all use our own phraseology."
He said Blair believed that "in fighting terrorism you should both use military means where necessary but also political means as well".
Michael Moore, the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesperson, said: "The so-called 'war on terror' has always been a flawed concept. Many will be cynical about Hilary Benn waiting until he is running for deputy leader of the Labour party before making these comments."
US sources played down Benn's criticism. David Johnson, deputy chief of mission at the US embassy, told Radio 4's PM program: "Mr Benn makes an important point we not only do not disagree on, but embrace: the solution will come not just with military force but development and working with other governments."
Archived from original publication
| All republished material is copyrighted by its original publisher.
This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this is a 'fair use' of copyrighted material, as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: www.law.cornell.edu/ uscode/17/107.shtml. |
|
|
There's much more than this at Unknown News.
|
|
|
