Welcome to UNKNOWN NEWS "News that's not known, or not known enough,"
from mainstream professional journalistic sources,
with colorful and occasionally cranky commentary.
Home  |  About us  |  Contact us  |  Dialogue  |  Guidelines  |  Index  |  Mystery links  |  Stickers & stuff  |
Dialogue: Letters to the editor
 
  Latest news           Latest dialogue         This page is archived as  unknownnews.org/070726-fd-26-ChrisD.html
 
   
What's their job, exactly?

by Chris D.

July 26, 2007
 PERMANENT LINK 
I've been thinking about this for a while now, and it just boggles my mind. Why is it standard practice for the FBI, when acting on a tip that someone might be a terrorist, to attempt to incite people to acts of violence, property damage, and other acts of terrorism?

Wouldn't the FBI's job be more to find out whether they were planning that kind of thing or not? And who they might be in contact with if they are?

It would appear that the agent doesn't simply leave if it turns out the tip was unfounded. They keep trying to push for extremist action and they don't stop until they get what they were supposedly trying to prevent to happen.

I mean seriously, what happens if an agent convinces a group of people that the only way to further an agenda of peace is to move from protesting and letter writing to assassination and the gullible bastards actually pull it off? Does the agent get charged with terrorism? How many acts of terrorism happened because an agent suggested it to an impressionable group?

It occurs to me that raving like a madman wouldn't work. These guys would have to be smooth talkers to not to wind up in jail or worse when they begin with their suggestions. It might even be the case that an agent is so practiced or skilled in the art of subterfuge and the science of convincing others of their point of view that they can turn patriots into pariahs. That's a scary thought.

It would be horrifically ironic if Al-Qaeda's biggest recruiter was the FBI. It's almost as scary to look at the other half of the equation. What kind of faith will people have in the justice system if they call the police on a guy overtly suggesting terrorism and nothing happens because they're the ones being investigated as possible
This is a topic I rarely talk about, because it's hard to relate the plain facts without sounding like a nut. Anyone who's well-informed about cops spying on American activists will sound paranoid to people who aren't well-informed.

As you know, we're been real world activists for a lot of years, been to a lot of rallies and a lot more meetings. When it comes to cop infiltrations, I think we're pretty well-informed. A few times over the years, I've spotted newcomers who were almost certainly police plants at meetings, just based on their comments from the edge of acceptable and beyond. And a few other times, I've had my suspicions.

You ask, "What's their job, exactly?" and you wonder why these undercover agents continue attending meetings, or even continue making suggestions of violence, instead of acknowledging that they've found yet another peaceful group and leaving.

The answer, Chris, is that the job of an undercover agent is to spy on political groups, to let his/her superiors know what's being discussed and planned, and/or to do whatever it takes to make a bust. An undercover agent is not sent to activists' meetings to find another peaceful group, nor is he/she sent to find out whether a particular group is peaceful or violent. A cop who finds that the group he/she's been sent to infiltrate isn't dangerous is a cop who isn't doing his/her job and won't long have his/her job.

A hound that doesn't smell something is just a dog that won't be brought hunting next time.


Helen & Harry

terrorists?

Now it might be common knowledge among established protest groups that anybody who joins up and immediately suggests blowing something up is a Fed but it might not be so obvious to others. Now, if I met someone who tried to seriously talk me into buying an assault rifle and attacking a military base I would definitely be looking to have handcuffs or a straight-jacket slapped on them.

But that's just me. Other people, especially somebody hopped up on fear and FOX News, might take a more direct and drastic approach to dealing with someone they think is recruiting for terrorism. I'll let you figure out what that means yourself. What happens then? How does that get explained when it comes time to administer justice?

Chris D. unknownnews@inbox.com




DISCLAIMER FOR DUMMIES

Our front page is free from nudity and profanity, but interior pages and external links may not be safe for work, and you may be shocked, offended, or in trouble with your boss. A link doesn't imply that we agree with every sentence and every sentiment on every site we link to. We use our noggins, and suggest you use yours.

Anything sent to Unknown News may be published. If you don't want it published, say so plainly. Of course, we publish all incoming hate mail.



 
We sell our own progressive bumper stickers:

pro-peace,
anti-Bush,
pro-freedom,
anti-Republican
stickers you won't
find anywhere else.

$3 each or two for $5

bumper stickers
 
Unknown News is more fun and more informative with your participation, so please don't be shy. Consider yourself invited to speak your mind.

Because we respect peoples' privacy, we do not keep records of friends' and contributors' contact information. This means we can't forward private communications between readers and writers, but we always welcome dialogue for publication.

When we publish incoming emails, we usually edit out the sender's last name, email address, or anything else that would tend to uniquely identify the author (if we slip up, please let us know). But if your email is unambiguously intended only to annoy, insult, or threaten us, we'll publish all the details, and leave it on-line forever.

 We're especially interested in hearing and considering different perspectives. All we ask is that you conduct yourself sanely and civilly. For the most productive dialogue, it helps if you'll cite a specific article or concept we've gotten wrong.

You can contact Helen & Harry at <newsuneed at yahoo.com>. If that address ever fails, our back-up email address is <unknownnews at inbox.com>.

But please, don't email us unless you're really and truly, honestly, actually trying to send the publishers of News a communication you're not sending to anyone or everyone else.

Please don't send attachments or other cr*p we don't want.

If you're trying to reach us but getting no reply, it's probably because you've sent us cr*p we don't want, so we're filtering your emails into the trash, unopened and unread.

If you'd like to have your email address unblocked, simply send a sincere apology (from an un-blocked email address).



   
  The dialogue page is our "letters to the editor" section. To participate, email your comments to newsuneed at yahoo.com.

  • Disclaimer for dummies
  • Hate mail
  • Latest dialogue
  • You can help

 

  Unknown News
This is who we are,
what we do,
and why we do it
 

 


Translate this page
 


Please buy a sticker
so the site won't flicker.






































 
YOU CAN HELP

We try not to whine too much or too loudly, but we are poor and this site eats a lot of time and especially money.

Just a buck or two can make all the difference and help keep Unknown News alive.

   Donations
   Sponsorships
   Stickers and stuff for sale
   Subscriptions
   Wish list
   Thank you

 
 
You can help
      We try not to whine too much or too loudly, but we are poor and this site eats a lot of time and especially money.
      Giving just a buck or two can make all the difference and keep Unknown News alive.
      Please donate or subscribe.

           
Talk to Us
Archives
If you have something to say,
we'd love to hear from you.
Click here for archives
of recent Unknown News
1234567890