Welcome to UNKNOWN NEWS
"News that's not known, or not known enough."  
Home  |  About us  |  Contact us  |  Dialogue  |  Guidelines  |  Index  |  Mystery links  |  Stickers & stuff  |
Commentary by Mr. Chuckles
PREVIOUS COLUMN       LATEST COLUMN       NEXT COLUMN


Hillary Clinton has leadership experience? Where?

by Mr. Chuckles, Unknown News      August 19, 2007

According to this interesting article, Senator Hillary Clinton "is billing herself to voters as the only candidate experienced enough to be presi-
dent," while Senator Barack Obama "is selling himself as an agent of change in Washington."

Hillary's claim is quite dubious. What successful  leadership role has she held?

Really, what we know about Hillary is that she was elected Senator in New York and that her one  chance in national politics prior to that,
 
which was to reform healthcare, nearly got her tarred and feathered -- an utter debacle which probably has her twitching now every time Obama or Edwards raise the issue of universal healthcare.

Dave Chappelle humorously remarked on Bill Clinton's fame, saying that he (Chappelle) knew about being famous, but he was amazed at Bill's fame -- so famous that just sucking his dick makes you famous (i.e. Monicagate.)

As Bill Clinton's wife, Hillary Clinton gained experience as someone who watches another person do a job. Perhaps she learned a lot watching her
If Hillary Clinton has ever led anything  -- a pack of Girl Scouts, a coven of witches, anything  -- I would really like to know.
  husband in the Oval Office, but that didn't teach her how to charm voters, or how to lead the country. To the contrary, she is famous for "triangulating" -- for never  taking the lead on any issue until a middle path is defined by people who are  willing to lead.

In my view, Hillary Clinton may get herself elected, thanks to certain monied interests looking for a continuation of the status quo. But she'll be out on her ass after four years in a public revolt. She will be hated and despised nearly as much as George W Bush, who at least has a non-thinking, faith-based core group of supporters, something Clinton doesn't have.

She will be the Carly Fiorina of presidents. High hopes going in, and years wasted. Talked a good game, could not lead.

A male example of how Hillary might turn out if "selected" by The Powers That Be is Gray Davis, the ex-governor of California who was recalled in a popular uprising by California voters.

Davis was a mechanic, groomed by The Machine to rise in power. He was a man with no leadership qualifications, but a long resume of jobs showing that he knew how to take orders from actual leaders  and execute someone else's plan.

So just laugh when Hillary says she is the most "experienced" candidate for President. As what, Towel Holder?

I don't mean to flog a dead pony on this, but... have you ever tried to "lead" a group? I have and let me tell you, I do not have the born ability. For example, when I was twelve years old, I was conscripted to umpire a Little League "minors" game, and I was nearly lynched! It's the same with business -- I'm just no good at it. Now, if Hillary C has ever led anything  -- a pack of Girl Scouts, a coven of witches, anything  -- I would really like to know. Otherwise, she should shut the freak up about her "experience" because it is meaningless.

That's why governors often get elected President but Senators rarely do -- two entirely different sorts of animals. Being a Senator is not about being a leader, it is about being a member of a very exclusive millionaires club.

To be fair, Hillary might  do well as President of the United States, but there is no way of knowing that in advance based on her resume. There is no record of her ever being "in charge" of anything, and since she is now as old as dirt -- nearly 60 years old -- the possibility that she has no leadership ability must be allowed.

If you want to give someone who has spent 60 years as backseat driver a chance behind the wheel, then vote for Hillary ...

© by the author.



Obama pledges to clean up Washington

by Mike Glover and Ron Fournier, Associated Press      Aug. 17, 2007

Democrat Barack Obama, who says he swims in "the same muddy water" of lobbyists and fundraising that corrupts Washington, is pledging to reform the system if elected president.

Presidential rival Hillary Rodham Clinton "doesn't recognize the problem," Obama told The Associated Press in an interview late Thursday.

"I have a bunch of friends who were state lobbyists. The fact of the matter is ... I played poker with them, so I don't think that lobbyists are evil," said the first-term Illinois senator. "I just think they've got an agenda and you got to be clear about that, and not pretend that they don't."

"Why else are they getting hired and making all this money unless they're actually getting something done?"

The renewed criticism of Clinton and Obama's blunt assessment of his own role in the "original sin" of politics is the latest twist in a Democratic primary fight over lobbyist donations. Fellow Democratic candidate John Edwards has challenged both Clinton and Obama to join him in refusing campaign donations from lobbyists.

In a joint appearance recently, Clinton refused to accept Edwards' challenge and issued a rare defense of lobbyists, saying many "represent real people." Obama joined Edwards in criticizing the New York senator, despite a record of accepting donations from state lobbyists - including some who regularly played poker with Obama during his days as a state senator.

Obama said Thursday he was not being hypocritical.

"I haven't gone around blasting Hillary" for accepting lobbyist money, Obama said in a 20-minute interview after touring the popular Iowa state fair with his wife and two young children. "What I said is she doesn't recognize the problem."

"My argument is not that we're perfect. I suffer from the same original sin of all politicians, which is we've got to raise money," Obama said. "But my argument has been and will continue to be that the disproportionate influence of lobbyists and special interest is a problem in Washington (and) in state capitals."

Obama pointed to his record of helping push ethics reform legislation through the Illinois Senate and Congress, and pledged to do more as president.

"I've fought for these issues," he said.

"The argument is not that I'm pristine, because I'm swimming in the same muddy water," Obama said. "The argument is that I know it's muddy and I want to clean it up."

A formidable fundraiser in a year of record-shattering political giving, Obama does not accept donations from lobbyists who press their cases in Washington, and he does not accept money from political action committees. He called that a good first step, if not a perfect one, that sends a signal that he would clean up Washington if elected.

"I do think that makes a difference," Obama said.

Not to Dan Leistikow, a spokesman for Edwards.

"John Edwards is the only candidate who has never taken a dime from PACs or Washington lobbyists, and he's leading the fight to get the entire Democratic Party to follow this example," Leistikow said.

While Edwards does not accept money directly from lobbyists, he eagerly solicits donations from people with ties to special interests and lobbyists - particularly the trial lawyer profession, which has a stake in actions taken by the White House and Congress.

On Friday, the Edwards campaign sent a letter touting his challenge to Obama on lobbying - and used it to appeal for donations.

Mark Daley, a spokesman for Clinton, said: "Senator Clinton has proposed real government reforms, including ending cronyism and stopping the revolving door from government to lobbyist, and she has the strength and experience to enact them."

Clinton is billing herself to voters as the only candidate experienced enough to be president. Obama is selling himself as an agent of change in Washington.

Archived from original publication

 
You're invited to respond:
unknownnews at inbox.com
 

We're usually unable to forward readers'
emails, but both readers and authors are
invited to visit our 'dialogue' page
for two-way communication:
unknownnews.org/dialogue.html

This is an archived Unknown News page. For newest material, visit our main page.


Previous articles
     by Mr. Chuckles:


Bail-out of the
rich has begun

by Mr. Chuckles

America's gift to Iraq:
Slow motion genocide

by Mr. Chuckles

A short glimpse at America's future
by Mr. Chuckles

Pottery Barn rule #2,
and the war in Iraq

by Mr. Chuckles

As "W" remains blissfully unaware ...
by Mr. Chuckles

Big changes at very high speeds
by Mr. Chuckles

Isreali/Palestinian
drama queens

by Mr. Chuckles

Different kinds
of American "citizens"

by Mr. Chuckles

What is, is (regardless
of what we're told)

by Mr. Chuckles

Stocks show surprising
strength -- but why?

by Mr. Chuckles

Poverty is coming to town
by Mr. Chuckles

The Decider's next decision
by Mr. Chuckles

Iraq Study Group vs. real world
by Mr. Chuckles

The pus-filled cyst of Republican leadership
by Mr. Chuckles

Explaining human dignity to President Bush
by Mr. Chuckles

A parable for 2006
by Mr. Chuckles

Things that don't matter, and things that matter a lot
by Mr. Chuckles

Five years of lies and
stupidity since 'the
world changed' on 9/11

by Mr. Chuckles

The Big War needs to start before November
by Mr. Chuckles

Facing ugly facts
about AmerIsrael

by Mr. Chuckles

Is Adolf getting a bad rap these days?
by Mr. Chuckles

Just another day
by Mr. Chuckles

Americans are waking up
to Reality -- and it is scary!

by Mr. Chuckles

If God answers prayers, America is doomed
by Mr Chuckles

Disconnected thoughts
by Mr Chuckles

Message to Christian America
by Mr Chuckles

Where do you stand?
by Mr Chuckles

Saddam Hussein for President
by Mr Chuckles

Bipartisan wars
and more wars

by Mr Chuckles

The Democrats' will
probably lose their asses
in this fall's elections

by Mr. Chuckles

Bush administration: Worse than al Qaeda
by Mr. Chuckles

 
  Unknown News
This is who we are,
what we do, and why we do it
 

 

Translate this page
 
Hillary Clinton might  do well as President of the United States, but there is no way of knowing that in advance based on her resume.

There is no record of her ever being "in charge" of anything, and since she is now as old as dirt -- nearly 60 years old -- the possibility that she has no leadership ability must be allowed.


 < Please buy a sticker
so the site won't flicker.
 

































 
YOU CAN HELP

We try not to whine too much or too loudly, but we are poor and this site eats a lot of time and especially money.

 
Just a buck or two can make all the difference and help keep Unknown News alive.

       Donations
       Sponsorships
       Stickers and stuff for sale
       Subscriptions
       Wish list
       Thank you

 


You can help
      We try not to whine too much or too loudly, but we are poor and this site eats a lot of time and especially money.
      Giving just a buck or two can make all the difference and keep Unknown News alive.
      Please donate or subscribe.

           
Talk to Us
Archives
If you have something to say, we'd love to hear from you. Click here for archives of recent editions of Unknown News
1234567890