Welcome to UNKNOWN NEWS
"News that's not known, or not known enough."
Helen & Harry Highwater's cranky weblog of news and opinion.
Home  |  About us  |  Contact us  |  Daily headlines  |  Dialogue  |  Guidelines  |  Index  |  Mystery links  |  Stickers & stuff  |
INFOBABBLE    by Kevin Good
MR GOOD's PREVIOUS COLUMN       LATEST COLUMN       NEXT COLUMN

Bush’s defeat victory

by Kevin Good, Unknown News      October 15, 2007

  To profit in a political capital down-market, the administration sells short. The Bush administration has chosen to challenge the death penalty of a self confessed heinous criminal saying the Mexican illegal immigrant’s civil rights were violated under a 1963 treaty known as the Vienna Convention and betting
the public will be outraged.

That's the issue that comes before the US Supreme Court on Wednesday, in a case that raises potentially profound questions about the scope of presidential authority (or responsibility) to enforce US treaty obligations that clash with the federal-state balance of power and principles of judicial independence.

The Supreme Court will hear the case that may determine whether the U.S. criminal justice system is subservient to an international court.

If Bush and company’s case before the Supreme Court is defeated, the Texas conviction and death sentence will stand and a legal precedent will be set, that US laws and courts are not bound by any international laws or treaties, like the Vienna or Geneva Conventions -- and Bush wins.

 
Another facet of this conundrum is that Bush, hoping to be over ruled by the Supreme Court, is right.

The United States Constitution Article VI, clause 2 states;
“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in the Constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.”
Expect to see moron Faux news.

© by the author.

 
We're usually unable to forward readers'
emails, but both readers and authors are
invited to visit our 'dialogue' page
for two-way communication:
unknownnews.org/dialogue.html
 

This is an archived Unknown News page. For newest material, visit our main page.


 
YOU CAN HELP

We try not to whine too much or too loudly, but we are poor and this site eats a lot of time and especially money.

Just a buck or two can make all the difference and help keep Unknown News alive.

 
Donations        Sponsorships
Stickers and stuff for sale
Subscriptions        Wish list        Thank you

 
 
  Please buy a sticker
so the site won't flicker.
 





































 

If you have something to say, we'd love to hear from you.

Click here for archives of recent editions of Unknown News.


 
 
If Bush and company’s case before the Supreme Court is defeated, the Texas conviction and death sentence will stand and a legal precedent will be set, that US laws and courts are not bound by any international laws or treaties, like the Vienna or Geneva Conventions -- and Bush wins.

  Unknown News
This is who we are,
what we do, and why we do it
 


 

 
in·fo·bab·ble
Pronunciation: INFOBABBLE!
Function: noun

1: the failure to communicate or the ability to misrepresent knowledge or intelligence

2: the attribute inherent in and communicated by one of two or more alternative sequences or arrangements of something (as nucleotides in DNA or binary digits in a computer program) that produce specific effects or a signal or character (as in a communication system or computer) representing data.

3: something (as a message, experimental data, or a picture) which justifies change in a construct (as a plan or theory) that represents physical or mental experience or other construct.