| |
|
Americans scale the heights of naïveté by The Canadian
| Dec. 21, 2007 |
Re Only a dream, only a myth
I continue to be amazed by the fact that at this point in America's history its Citizens are the only 1st-world people who truly and deeply believe their own propaganda.
Please name me one US President in the last 100 years that was placed in power due to his convictions only without the monied aid of business interests. The belief that this is possible or was ever possible remains the height of naïveté.
Even a critique of the present US system of government generally includes the underlying presupposition that the ideal of US democracy once existed or can exist.
It has never existed in its ideal form, but it did grant a great deal more personal and economic freedom than other competing forms of government during the 20th Century.
I am not naive enough to think that life would have been better without the use of US power over the last 100 years or so. Living under communist / fascist rule would have been a far less livable life than we know today. Under the present circumstances, however, I see only the ever present march toward a 21st Century version of a theocratically conforming police state in the US. Following 8 years of disastrous neocon government policy, even the ideology of Democracy remains but a thin veneer.
Beware the Ides of March Julius Caesar.
| |
The only thing I can quibble with here is that I guess I'm not surprised that average Americans still believe the lies of American absolute excellence. The propaganda is, I swear, just about the only thing the commingled government and media here do really, really well. From the earliest moments of public education to virtually any newscast allowed on radio or television that reaches more than a tiny sliver of the audience, virtually every statement spoken and unspoken is either a lie or based on underlying assumptions that are lies. The shrinking minority of Americans who read newspapers are somewhat better informed, but it's hard to wring the truth out of corporate media that habitually says what government tells it and asks no questions.
I like to believe Americans wouldn't stand for what's happening if they knew what's happening. I say "I like to believe" because I have no evidence it's true, but if I don't believe it I'll have to shoot myself. But there's next to no access to the un-spun truth unless you're reaching beyond American borders to find it, and most Americans are working their butts off just to pay their medical and heating bills -- they don't know there's an emergency, don't know there's been a coup, because "nuts" like you and me are the only people telling them there's a problem. On every channel, in every newspaper, the nation's leaders and media tell us everything's relatively ordinary, business as usual, nothing to see here, move along, move along ... |
|
Helen & Harry
|
|
|
Our front page is free from nudity and profanity, but interior pages and external links may not be safe for work, and you may be shocked, offended, or in trouble with your boss. A link doesn't imply that we agree with every sentence and every sentiment on every site we link to. We use our noggins, and suggest you use yours.
Anything sent to Unknown News may be published. If you don't want it published, say so plainly. Of course, we publish all incoming hate mail.
|
|
|
| |
We sell our own progressive bumper stickers:
pro-peace, anti-Bush, pro-freedom, anti-Republican stickers you won't find anywhere else.
$3 each or two for $5
bumper stickers
|
|
| |
| Unknown News is more fun and more informative with your participation, so please don't be shy. Consider yourself invited to speak your mind.
Because we respect peoples' privacy, we do not keep records of friends' and contributors' contact information. This means we can't forward private communications between readers and writers, but we always welcome dialogue for publication.
When we publish incoming emails, we usually edit out the sender's last name, email address, or anything else that would tend to uniquely identify the author (if we slip up, please let us know). But if your email is unambiguously intended only to annoy, insult, or threaten us, we'll publish all the details, and leave it on-line forever.
We're especially interested in hearing and considering different perspectives. All we ask is that you conduct yourself sanely and civilly. For the most productive dialogue, it helps if you'll cite a specific article or concept we've gotten wrong.
You can contact Helen & Harry at <newsuneed at yahoo.com>. If that address ever fails, our back-up email address is <unknownnews at inbox.com>.
But please, don't email us unless you're really and truly, honestly, actually trying to send the publishers of News a communication you're not sending to anyone or everyone else.
Please don't send attachments or other cr*p we don't want.
If you're trying to reach us but getting no reply, it's probably because you've sent us cr*p we don't want, so we're filtering your emails into the trash, unopened and unread.
If you'd like to have your email address unblocked, simply send a sincere apology (from an un-blocked email address).
| |
|
| |
The dialogue page is our "letters to the editor" section.
To participate, email your comments to newsuneed at yahoo.com.
|
| |