![]() |
"News that's not known, or not known enough." Helen & Harry Highwater's cranky weblog of news and opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bush-Democrat tax rebates: Worse than Guantanamo
It is very clear that in spite of being the most famous "Christian", George Bush is a textbook sociopath. This plan doesn't just miss the mark it ignores both practical reality and compassion. If our country plans to just blow out the treasury giving out $150 billion in free money, but plans to give nothing to help the poorest among us, then we are damned. This is actually worse than Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib because it demonstrates soulless disregard of our very own citizens. And it convicts not just George Bush but Congress itself, especially the Democrats, who couldn't vote YES fast enough. The most forgiving thing that could be said of this plan is that it is a thinly disguised attempt to purchase votes for incumbents using the people's money. I estimate that they have stolen, wasted, or cronyized between $10,000 and $30,000 for every one of the 300,000,000 citizens (if you don't have your calculator, that is ten to thirty trillion And it makes a mockery of capitalism itself! Every Bushian or Rumsfeldian brainfart costs at least $10 billion What's been happening due to the debt collapse is that they've doled out at least half a trillion already The whole System under Bush is like a perpetual bank robbery. They turn a blind eye to their own crimes, lies and corruption but come down very hard on everyone else The thing that will bring all of this to an end is global market forces. It might take more years, but when it happens the shit will hit the fan... maybe hyperinflation, like Zimbabwe. Or nationalization of individuals' property to subsidize the corporations. Or maybe just benign neglect as the Feds renege on everything and stop enforcing their own laws after they lose their budget buying power. Hard to say, but a crisis of confidence in the US dollar and repayment of the national debt will stop all of this nonsense really fast. AND that is what I am betting will happen
Because we respect peoples' privacy, we do not keep records of friends' and contributors' contact information. This means we can't forward private communications between readers and writers, but we always welcome dialogue for publication. When we publish incoming emails, we usually edit out the sender's last name, email address, or anything else that would tend to uniquely identify the author (if we slip up, please let us know). But if your email is unambiguously intended only to annoy, insult, or threaten us, we'll publish all the details, and leave it on-line forever. We're especially interested in hearing and considering different perspectives. All we ask is that you conduct yourself sanely and civilly. For the most productive dialogue, it helps if you'll cite a specific article or concept we've gotten wrong. You can contact Helen & Harry at <newsuneed at yahoo.com>. If that address ever fails, our back-up email address is <unknownnews at inbox.com>. But please, don't email us unless you're really and truly, honestly, actually trying to send the publishers of News a communication you're not sending to anyone or everyone else. Please don't send attachments or other cr*p we don't want. If you're trying to reach us but getting no reply, it's probably because you've sent us cr*p we don't want, so we're filtering your emails into the trash, unopened and unread. If you'd like to have your email address unblocked, simply send a sincere apology (from an un-blocked email address).
|
|