Welcome to UNKNOWN NEWS
"News that's not known, or not known enough."  
Home  |  About us  |  Contact us  |  Dialogue  |  Guidelines  |  Index  |  Mystery links  |  Stickers & stuff  |
Unknown News:  The news you need, whether you know it or not.
   

CIA dropped the ball on fighting terrorism
-- but not until Bush took office


International Herald Tribune      August 23, 2007

The CIA inspector general's report on the agency's failures before Sept. 11 was devastating -- but not because it showed that America's spies missed the rise of Al Qaeda. George Tenet, then the director of central intelligence, rang the Qaeda alarm.

He sent a memo to the entire intelligence community saying that he wanted no effort spared in the "war" with Osama bin Laden. He took on the president's closest advisers to agitate for a strike on a Qaeda base in Afghanistan.

The disturbing thing was that this all happened under President Bill Clinton. When George W. Bush won the White House, Tenet seems to have shifted his priorities. The CIA chief suddenly seemed consumed with hanging on to his job (through such innovative anti-terrorism measures as naming the CIA's headquarters in Langley, Virgina, for Bush's father).

The Bush team was so busy in 2001 trying to upend America's global relationships according to a neo-conservative agenda that the then national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, did not see any urgency in reports that Al Qaeda was determined to strike in the United States.
 
Filed under:
Questions about September 11, 2001
Commentary by Helen & Harry:

The true story of the events leading up to 9/11 is a tragic account of ineptitude, incompetence, and suspicions of more than we know, followed by a blizzard of ass-
covering after the fact.

And among the people charged with overseeing America's defense on that day, from George Tenet to George Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice -- the list goes on, but our patience runs short -- is there anyone among them who doesn't deserve to be tarred and feathered ... and indicted?


Helen & Harry
 
   
Tenet later helped hype the "slam dunk" intelligence that Bush used to justify diverting the military from the war of necessity against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan to the war of choice in Iraq.

Another disturbing aspect of the report released this week was its date, June 2005, which neatly sums up Bush's policies on transparency and accountability -- he doesn't believe in either. Perhaps it's not surprising that the report wasn't released in 2005. Bush had just given Tenet the Presidential Medal of Freedom for his "pivotal" role in fighting Al Qaeda.

But it's distressing that the CIA director, General Michael Hayden, still says that he would not have released the report if the
 
George Tenet, then the director of central intelligence, rang the Qaeda alarm. He sent a memo to the entire intelligence community saying that he wanted no effort spared in the "war" with Osama bin Laden. He took on the president's closest advisers to agitate for a strike on a Qaeda base in Afghanistan.

The disturbing thing was that this all happened under President Bill Clinton. When George W. Bush won the White House, Tenet seems to have shifted his priorities.
Democratic-led Congress had not required it. Like his predecessor, Porter Goss, who also quashed the report, Hayden does not seem to have much confidence in the American people.

"It will, at a minimum, consume time and attention revisiting ground that is already well plowed," he said, adding that the inspector general's office cannot do its work unless it is
Another disturbing aspect of the report released this week was its date, June 2005, which neatly sums up Bush's policies on transparency and accountability -- he doesn't believe in either.

Perhaps it's not surprising that the report wasn't released in 2005. Bush had just given Tenet the Presidential Medal of Freedom for his "pivotal" role in fighting Al Qaeda.
  hush-hush.

We could not disagree more. The recommendations of the inspector general were tepid -- a panel should decide whether senior leaders should be called to account on relatively narrow issues -- and the administration has already refused to comply. But more broadly, the obsession with secrecy and refusal to accept public scrutiny have made a tragic mess of national security policy.

Americans still don't have the full story of how Bush hustled them into a war in which United States soldiers are trapped
without hope of victory. Congress has rushed to pass profoundly dangerous changes to the constitutional fabric -- the PATRIOT Act, the Military Commissions Act of 2006, recent changes to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act -- without real deliberation.

The good news is that Senator Jay Rockefeller, Democrat of West Virginia, now runs the Senate Intelligence Committee, and he forced the release of this report. He also is pushing the committee to finally finish its investigation into the creation of the myth of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.

This is not about plowing old ground. Ignoring the mistakes of the past dooms a nation to repeat them. Just look at the comparison Bush drew Wednesday between Iraq and Vietnam. The only lesson he found in the nation's last foreign quagmire of a war was that it ended too quickly.

Archived from original publication

 

All republished material is copyrighted by its original publisher.

This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this is a 'fair use' of copyrighted material, as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: www.law.cornell.edu/ uscode/17/107.shtml.


There's much more than this at Unknown News.

 
  Unknown News
This is who we are,
what we do,
and why we do it
 

 


Translate this page
 

Please buy a sticker so the site won't flicker.

































 
YOU CAN HELP

We try not
to whine
too much
or too
loudly, but
we are
poor and
this site eats a lot of time and especially money.

Just a buck or two can make all the difference and help keep Unknown News alive.

   Donations
   Sponsorships
   Stickers and
stuff for sale
   Subscriptions
   Wish list
   Thank you

 
 
You can help
      We try not to whine too much or too loudly, but we are poor and this site eats a lot of time and especially money.
      Giving just a buck or two can make all the difference and keep Unknown News alive.
      Please donate or subscribe.

           
Talk to Us
Archives
If you have something to say,
we'd love to hear from you.
Click here for archives
of recent Unknown News
1234567890