WASHINGTON — Declaring "the game is over," President Bush on Thursday said the United States would take "whatever action is necessary" to disarm Iraq now that the world has seen Washington's evidence that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has lied about possessing weapons of mass destruction. [Reality check]
In his harshest terms yet about the crisis in the Persian Gulf, Bush rhetorically took the world to the brink of war but stopped short of declaring it. Bush said Hussein is throwing away his last chance for peace and challenged the U.N. Security Council to approve a new resolution authorizing the use of force to disarm Iraq.
"The United States, along with a growing coalition of nations, is resolved to take whatever action is necessary to defend ourselves and disarm the Iraqi regime," Bush said after meeting with Secretary of State Colin Powell, one day after Powell presented the Security Council extensive U.S. evidence of Iraq's efforts to hide its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons materials.
"Saddam Hussein has the motive and the means and the recklessness and the hatred to threaten the American people," Bush said. "Saddam Hussein will be stopped."
Even as the president spoke, the Defense Department was ordering the Army's storied 101st Airborne Division to deploy to the gulf region to join an estimated 110,000 troops already in position for a possible war. The elite rapid deployment division played a key role in the ground phase of the 1991 gulf war.
The Turkish parliament, meanwhile, voted Thursday to allow U.S. troops to renovate Turkish bases for use in a possible war. Turkish officials said they expected the parliament would also soon approve the stationing of tens of thousands of U.S. combat troops, which would permit the Pentagon to open a crucial northern front in any war against Baghdad.
With war preparations accelerating, the State Department issued a "worldwide caution" to all Americans that they faced a growing danger of attacks from terrorist groups everywhere in the world.
Bush dramatized the potential threat as he recounted Powell's evidence of Iraq's continuing weapons programs. The president warned that a single unmanned Iraqi aircraft, rigged to spray biological agents, could be launched off the American coast and "reach hundreds of miles inland."
Bush did not specify a deadline for the Security Council to act, or for his own decision whether to launch a war. But White House officials noted that the president pointedly refrained from repeating his earlier timeline of "weeks, not months," suggesting that further consultations might not last even that long.
Nor did Bush repeat that Hussein still had time to come into compliance with U.N. disarmament demands.
"Saddam Hussein was given a final chance. He is throwing that chance away," Bush said. "The dictator of Iraq is making his choice. Now the nations of the Security Council must make their own."
Powell, testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he was confident that Washington was beginning to sway skeptical allies.
After speaking with a dozen Security Council foreign ministers following his U.N. presentation, Powell said, he sensed a "shift in attitude" that Iraq can no longer be permitted to defy the world body.
"I think there might be perhaps more support for a second resolution than some might think," Powell said.
Publicly, however, the leading Security Council critics of the use of force — France, Russia and Germany — did not back down from their opposition Thursday.
"We refuse to think that war is inevitable," French President Jacques Chirac said.
But Washington's closest ally, Britain, indicated that it was preparing to introduce a Security Council resolution authorizing force shortly after chief U.N. weapons inspectors Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei make their next report to the council Feb. 14.
REALITY CHECK: Who really has weapons of mass destruction?
in·san·i·ty n. 1 a : a deranged state of the mind usually occurring as a specific disorder (as schizophrenia) and usually excluding such states as mental retardation, psychoneurosis, and various character disorders
b : a mental disorder
2 : such unsoundness of mind or lack of understanding as prevents one from having the mental capacity required by law to enter into a particular relationship, status, or transaction or as removes one from criminal or civil responsibility
Like the URL says, this website is about unknown news.
Our news comes only from mainstream, professional journalists or (rarely) other sources we trust entirely, with no nuttiness and no interest in the same news you see everywhere else.
What we believe
We believe in liberty and justice for all, so of course, we oppose many US government policies. This doesn't mean we're anti-American, redneck scum, pinko commies, militia members, or terrorist-sympathizers. It means we believe in freedom, as more than merely a cliché.
We believe you have the right to live your own life as you choose, and others have the equal right to live their lives as they choose. It's not complicated.
We believe freedom leads to peace, progress, and prosperity, while its opposite -- oppression -- leads to war, terrorism, poverty, and misery.
We believe it's preposterously stupid to hate people because of their appearance, their race or nationality, their religion or lack of religion, how they have sex with other consenting adults, etc. There are far more apropos reasons to hate most people.
We believe in questioning ourselves, our assumptions, each other -- and we especially believe in questioning authority (the more authority, the more questions). We believe obedience is a fine quality in dogs and young children, but not in adults.
Like America's right-wingers, we believe in
individual responsibility,
hard work to get ahead,
and stern punishment for serious crimes.
We believe big government should not be blindly trusted.
But unlike most right-wing leaders, we mean it.
Like America's left-wingers, we believe in
equal treatment under law,
war as a last (not first) resort,
and sensible stewardship of natural resources.
We believe big business should not be blindly trusted.
But unlike most left-wing leaders, we mean it.
Like libertarians, we believe it's wrong and reprehensible to arrest people for what they think, believe, look like, wear, eat, smoke, drink, inhale, inject, or otherwise do to themselves.
But unlike many libertarians, we're not obsessed with the gold standard, we don't believe incorporation is humanity's highest achievement, and we don't believe everything in life comes down to dollars and cents. We've read and enjoyed Ayn Rand's novels, but we understand that they're works of fiction.
We're skeptical, and we're sick of so-called 'journalists' who aren't skeptical at all.
A reader asks, what are our solutions?
We propose no solutions except common sense, which is never common. We like the principles of democracy, and the ideals broadly described as 'American'. The US Constitution is a fine and workable framework for solutions, when it's actually read and thoughtfully understood by intelligent statesmen and women. So, no manifestos from us. We don't dream that big, and if there's one thing the world doesn't need it's yet another manifesto.
Our suggestion is: think.
A fact-based instead of faith-based approach leads to solutions for most of the recurring issues of our time, from abortion to global climate change, pollution to universal health care, careful but real regulation of industry and economy, hunger, war, terror, human rights for humans not for corporations, science not religious doctrine in public schools, equal protection and prosecution under law, etc. Approach problems without glorifying stupidity, without demonizing intelligence, and answers usually come into focus.
These pages are published by Harry and Helen Highwater, happily married low-income nom de plumes and rabble-rousers from Madison, Wisconsin (with a few friends scattered around the world helping out).
We try to spotlight news that hasn't gotten enough (or appropriate) attention in American media, along with our opinions and yours.
We bang our keyboards against the wall, because it doesn't hurt as much as banging our heads.
We assume our readers are well-informed before they click here, so we focus on news that's generally unknown or under-reported. We're generally disinterested in such non-news as reports on what politicians might do, may do, or should do, and we don't usually mention the murders, kidnappings, house fires, auto wrecks, celebrity crap, wacky fluff, and other nonsense that's pushed real news right out of the newscasts.
Disclaimer for dummies: Our front page is free from nudity, but we make no promise on profanity. If your surfing is monitored this site might not be safe for work, and you may be shocked, offended, or in trouble with your boss. A link doesn't imply that we agree with every sentence and every sentiment on every site we link to. We use our noggins, and suggest you use yours.
We always welcome comments from readers, and we're especially interested in hearing and considering different perspectives, so please don't be shy. All we ask is that you conduct yourself sanely and civilly, so consider yourself invited to speak your mind. Our email address and other info is on our contact page.
Please don't email us unless you're sending an original communication that you're not sending to anyone or everyone else. If you add us to your mailing list or chat group without asking us first, or if you send "Dear friend" newsletters, or "link exchange" form letters, or if you send a press release every time you add a post to your blog, you're a spammer and we'll soon block your emails. Also, as a matter of security, we don't open emails from strangers which include attachments or have any kind of programming imbedded, and we recommend a similar policy for others. If you're sending us an email, please send it in plain text only.
Our RSS feed of Unknown News headlines is updated whenever we update the site. Click the orange button for more information, or just get the feed at http://unknownnews.org/ RSSfeeds/dailyRSS.xml.
(Enormous and eternal thanksto Doug at mistersquirrel.net, for setting up our RSS feed.)
Our privacy policy has a page of its own, but the short and sweet version is: We're in favor of privacy. We make no effort to track or identify anything about visitors to our website. We never share, trade, or sell email addresses. We never send spam. We never send email, except in response to readers' queries. We never send (or open) attachments of any kind, and we delete un-opened any emails received with attachments.
Anything sent to Unknown News may be published. If you don't want it published, say so plainly. When we publish incoming emails, we edit out the sender's last name and email address — if we slip up (or if you want your full name and email address published) please let us know. Of course, if your email is unambiguously intended only to annoy, insult, or threaten us, we'll publish it with all the details and leave it on-line forever.
