Welcome to UNKNOWN NEWS
"News that's not known,
or not known enough.
"
We have
unique stickers,
books and surprises!
Home  |  About us  |  Contact us  |  Dialogue  |  Guidelines  |  Index  |  Mystery links  |  Stickers & stuff  |
MR BUSH'S
PREVIOUS EPISODE
IS GEORGE W BUSH INSANE?
Tour recent 'episodes' and decide for yourself
MR BUSH'S
NEXT EPISODE

If you like what we do,
please
help us do it.


Bush's deal with India would proliferate WMDs

by Ron Hutcheson and Jonathan S. Landay, Knight Ridder News Service

Some U.S. lawmakers and many arms-control experts said the pact would undercut the global system designed to halt the spread of nuclear arms, making it harder to rein in suspected Iranian and North Korean nuclear-weapons programs.

... The accord would end India's status as a nuclear renegade and clear the way for U.S. companies to sell civilian nuclear equipment to India.

In return, India would declare 14 of 22 reactors part of its civilian program and place them under international monitoring.

... Eight reactors wouldn't be covered by the safeguards and could remain sources of plutonium for weapons.
  March 3, 2006

A landmark nuclear pact reached Thursday by President Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh faced tough scrutiny by Congress and international regulators amid concerns that it would allow India to expand its nuclear arsenal by hundreds of weapons.

If approved by Congress, the accord would recognize India as a nuclear military power and herald a major expansion in ties between the world's largest democracy and the United States after decades of strained relations.

"What this agreement says is things change. Times change," Bush said, appearing with Singh at Hyderabad House, the Indian government's guest residence.

"We have made history today, and I thank you," Singh said.

Some U.S. lawmakers and many
arms-control experts said the pact
would undercut the global system designed to halt the spread of nuclear arms, making it harder to rein in suspected Iranian and North Korean nuclear-weapons programs.

Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., a co-sponsor of bipartisan legislation that would block the deal, said it made a mockery of the cornerstone of the system, the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which India never signed.

"With one simple move the president has blown a hole in the nuclear rules that the entire world has been playing by," Markey said.

"It empowers the hawks in every rogue nation to put their nuclear-weapons plans on steroids."

While welcoming the accord, several senior Republican lawmakers, including Rep. Henry Hyde, R-Ill., chairman of the House International Relations Committee, said they would give it a rigorous review.

The accord also will have to pass muster with the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group. It was formed to regulate civilian nuclear trade after India detonated a device in 1974 using plutonium obtained from a Canadian-made civilian reactor that was supplied with heavy water by the United States.

The group decides matters by consensus. Several members expressed misgivings with the India-U.S. nuclear agreement.

The accord would end India's status as a nuclear renegade and clear the way for U.S. companies to sell civilian nuclear equipment to India. In return, India would declare 14 of 22 reactors part of its civilian program and place them under international monitoring.

Bush said Americans would benefit because increased use of nuclear power in India would reduce global demand for oil.

With 1.1 billion people and one of the world's fastest growing economies, India is consuming a larger share of global energy supplies, a key force behind rising oil prices.

"Our Congress has got to understand that it's in our economic interest that India have a nuclear-power industry," Bush said.

In addition to approving the pact, Congress would have to pass legislation exempting India from a 1978 law banning nuclear trade with nations that conduct nuclear test explosions or don't accept comprehensive safeguards laid out by the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency.

IAEA Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei called the deal "a step forward towards universalization of the international safeguards regime."

The accord, however, excluded important parts of India's nuclear program from safeguards.

Eight reactors wouldn't be covered by the safeguards and could remain sources of plutonium for weapons.

The facilities include several civilian power plants and a fast-breeder reactor that will produce large amounts of plutonium.

As originally published

 
You're invited to respond:
unknownnews at myway.com
 

This is an archived Unknown News page. For newest material, visit our main page.



There's much more than this at Unknown News.


in·sane   adj.
1 : mentally dis-
ordered : exhibiting insanity

2 : used by, typical of, or intended for insane persons (an insane asylum)

3 : ABSURD (an insane scheme for making money)
  —Merriam-Webster

in·san·i·ty  
n.
1 a : a deranged state of the mind usually occurring as a specific disorder (as schizophrenia) and usually excluding such states as mental retardation, psychoneurosis, and various character disorders

b : a mental disorder

2 : such unsoundness of mind or lack of understanding as prevents one from having the mental capacity required by law to enter into a particular relationship, status, or transaction or as removes one from criminal or civil responsibility

3 a : extreme folly or unreasonableness

b : something utterly foolish or unreasonable
  —Merriam-Webster


You should buy a sticker!

You should buy a sticker!

Progressive, pro-peace,
anti-Bush-Cheney stickers!


$3 each, or two for $5

You can help
      We try not to whine too much or too loudly, but we are poor and this site eats a lot of money and time.
      We couldn't do it without the help of our volunteers. And for those who can't afford the time, giving just a buck or two can make all the difference and keep Unknown News alive.


Talk to Us
Archives
If you have something to say, we'd love to hear from you. Click here for archives of recent editions of Unknown News