At international summit, Bush gropes German Chancellor
by Helen & Harry Highwater, Unknown News
July 19, 2006
At the G-8 Conference in St. Petersburg, President George W Bush approached German Chancellor Angela Merkel from behind, and began rubbing her shoulders. It is not difficult to read Merkel's facial expressions, as she squirmed and shook until the American President removed his hands.
Most American newspapers and news networks didn't think it was newsworthy until the next day, when "the news" was that photos of the incident were "burning up the blogosphere," as the Boston Globe reported. "It's not exactly 'Presidents Gone Wild', joked the San Francisco Chronicle. "The tabloids have pounced, and so have comedians like Jon Stewart," ABC News announced in the network's first mention of the incident, more than 24 hours after it happened.
Without any exceptions we could find, it was reported in American media as wacky, funny, or just good-natured goofing around from the President. Maureen Dowd of The New York Times provided the best mainstream coverage, putting Bush's bizarre behavior in broader context with other Bush bevahior oddities, but even Dowd seemed to see it as just a sign of the President's immaturity.
We emphatically disagree. Such behavior is not merely immature and, of course, not "Presidential," it is — by any normal standard — not tolerated.
If an office worker or a bricklayer or virtually any man in virtually any ordinary job grabbed a female co-worker and started massaging her shoulders without warning or permission, the consequences would depend on the woman's response. She might laugh it off, sure — but if she complained, most employers would scold or reprimand Bush — and rightly so. In some workplaces he would be fired, without any second chances.
Bush's behavior here is inappropriate to the edge of sexual harassment, and not at all how civilized men behave in a work situation with women they barely know. The American media presents it as "frat boy" antics, but we believe it's more serious than that, especially when considered in light of other odd moments in Bush's peculiar Presidency.
George W Bush does not know the boundaries of acceptable social behavior, or does not think such boundaries apply to him. And there's a word for that: psychopathy.
Animal House at G-8 Summit
by Maureen Dowd, The New York Times
July 19, 2006
Reporters who covered W.'s 2000 campaign often wondered whether the Bush
scion would give up acting the fool if he got to be the king.
Would he stop playing peekaboo with his pre-meal moist towels during
airplane interviews? Would he quit scrunching up his face and wiggling his
eyebrows at memorial services? Would he replace levity and inanity with
gravity?
German Chancellor Angela Merkel speaks with Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi.
American President George Bush approaches from behind, and puts his hands on her shoulders.
President Bush begins mas- saging Chancellor Merkel's shoulders with his fingers.
Chancellor Merkel begins lifting her shoulders to escape President Bush's grasp.
Grimacing, Chancellor Merkel lifts her arms, makes both hands into fists. President Bush releases her.
President Bush walks away with a blank look but no apology. Chancellor Merkel lowers her fists.
"In many regards, the Bush I knew did not seem to be built for what lay
ahead," wrote Frank Bruni, the Times writer who covered W.'s ascent, in his
book "Ambling Into History." "The Bush I knew was part scamp and part
bumbler, a timeless fraternity boy and heedless cutup, a weekday gym rat and
weekend napster, an adult with an inner child that often brimmed to the
surface or burst through."
The open-microphone incident at the G-8 lunch in St. Petersburg on Monday
illustrated once more that W. never made any effort to adapt. The president
has enshrined his immaturity and insularity, turning every environment he
inhabits — no matter how decorous or serious — into a comfortable frat
house.
No matter what the trappings or the ceremonies require of the leader of the
free world, he brings the same Delta Kappa Epsilon bearing and cadences, the same
insouciance and smart-alecky attitude, the same simplistic approach —
swearing, swaggering, talking to Tony Blair with his mouth full of buttered
roll, and giving a startled Angela Merkel an impromptu shoulder rub. He can
make even a global summit meeting seem like a kegger.
Catching W. off-guard, the really weird thing is his sense of victimization.
He's strangely resentful about the actual core of his job. Even after the
debacles of Iraq and Katrina, he continues to treat the presidency as a
colossal interference with his desire to mountain bike and clear brush.
In snippets of overheard conversation, Mr. Bush says he has not bothered to
prepare any closing remarks and grouses about having to listen to other
world leaders talk too long. What did he think being president was about?
The world may be blowing up, and the president may have a rare opportunity
to jaw-jaw about bang-bang with his peers, but that pales in comparison with
his burning desire to return to his feather pillow and gym back at the White
House.
"Gotta go home," he tells the guy next to him. "Got something to do
tonight. Go to the airport, get on the airplane and go home." A White House
spokesman said Mr. Bush had nothing on his schedule after he returned to
Washington on Monday about 4 p.m.
When he began meandering about how big Russia was, you expected him to yell,
"Yo, Condi!" and ask his secretary of state: "Hey, what's the name of that
other big country that has more people than any other country in the world?
It begins with a ‘C.' Dad spent some time there."
Perhaps it's that anti-patrician chip on his shoulder, his rebellion against
a family that prized manners and diplomacy above all. But when bored or
frustrated, W. reserves the right to be boorish — no matter if the setting
is a gilded palace or a Texas gorge.
He treated Tony "As It Were" Blair like the servant in The Remains of the
Day, blowing off his offer to help with the Israel-Lebanon crisis, and
changing the subject from substance to fluff at one point, noting about his
60th-birthday Burberry gift: "Thanks for the sweater. Awfully thoughtful of
you." Then he razzed the British prime minister, who was hovering and
wheedling like an abused wife: "I know you picked it out yourself."
After doing his best to undermine the U.N. and Kofi Annan, W. talked about
the secretary general like a fraternity pledge he wanted to send out for
more beer or a keg of Diet Coke: "I felt like telling Kofi to get on the
phone with Assad and make something happen."
His loosey-goosey confidence that everything could be fixed with a phone
call — and not even a phone call made by him, and not even a phone call made
to the Iranians, who have more control over Hezbollah — was striking. He
seems to have no clue that his own headlong, heedless actions in the Middle
East have contributed to the deepening chaos there, and to Iran's growing
influence and America's diminished leverage.
Mr. Bush may resent the sophistication required of a president. But when the
world is going to hell, he should stop chewing and start thinking.
in·san·i·ty n. 1 a : a deranged state of the mind usually occurring as a specific disorder (as schizophrenia) and usually excluding such states as mental retardation, psychoneurosis, and various character disorders
b : a mental disorder
2 : such unsoundness of mind or lack of understanding as prevents one from having the mental capacity required by law to enter into a particular relationship, status, or transaction or as removes one from criminal or civil responsibility
Like the URL says, this website is about unknown news.
We present a once-weekly wrap-up of news that was underplayed, ignored, or simply lost in the non-stop news cycle. Our news comes only from mainstream, professional journalists or (rarely) other sources we trust entirely, with no nuttiness and no interest in the same news you see everywhere else.
What we believe
We believe in liberty and justice for all, so of course, we oppose many US government policies. This doesn't mean we're anti-American, redneck scum, pinko commies, militia members, or terrorist-sympathizers. It means we believe in freedom, as more than merely a cliché.
We believe you have the right to live your own life as you choose, and others have the equal right to live their lives as they choose. It's not complicated.
We believe freedom leads to peace, progress, and prosperity, while its opposite -- oppression -- leads to war, terrorism, poverty, and misery.
We believe it's preposterously stupid to hate people because of their appearance, their race or nationality, their religion or lack of religion, how they have sex with other consenting adults, etc. There are far more apropos reasons to hate most people.
We believe in questioning ourselves, our assumptions, each other -- and we especially believe in questioning authority (the more authority, the more questions). We believe obedience is a fine quality in dogs and young children, but not in adults.
Like America's right-wingers, we believe in
individual responsibility,
hard work to get ahead,
and stern punishment for serious crimes.
We believe big government should not be blindly trusted.
But unlike most right-wing leaders, we mean it.
Like America's left-wingers, we believe in
equal treatment under law,
war as a last (not first) resort,
and sensible stewardship of natural resources.
We believe big business should not be blindly trusted.
But unlike most left-wing leaders, we mean it.
Like libertarians, we believe it's wrong and reprehensible to arrest people for what they think, believe, look like, wear, eat, smoke, drink, inhale, inject, or otherwise do to themselves.
But unlike many libertarians, we're not obsessed with the gold standard, we don't believe incorporation is humanity's highest achievement, and we don't believe everything in life comes down to dollars and cents. We've read and enjoyed Ayn Rand's novels, but we understand that they're works of fiction.
We're skeptical, and we're sick of so-called 'journalists' who aren't skeptical at all.
A reader asks, what are our solutions?
We propose no solutions except common sense, which is never common. We like the principles of democracy, and the ideals broadly described as 'American'. The US Constitution is a fine and workable framework for solutions, when it's actually read and thoughtfully understood by intelligent statesmen and women. So, no manifestos from us. We don't dream that big, and if there's one thing the world doesn't need it's yet another manifesto.
Our suggestion is: think.
A fact-based instead of faith-based approach leads to solutions for most of the recurring issues of our time, from abortion to global climate change, pollution to universal health care, careful but real regulation of industry and economy, hunger, war, terror, human rights for humans not for corporations, science not religious doctrine in public schools, equal protection and prosecution under law, etc. Approach problems without glorifying stupidity, without demonizing intelligence, and answers usually come into focus.
These pages are published by Harry and Helen Highwater, happily married low-income nom de plumes and rabble-rousers from Madison, Wisconsin (with a few friends scattered around the world helping out).
We try to spotlight news that hasn't gotten enough (or appropriate) attention in American media, along with our opinions and yours.
We bang our keyboards against the wall, because it doesn't hurt as much as banging our heads.
We assume our readers are well-informed before they click here, so we focus on news that's generally unknown or under-reported. We're generally disinterested in such non-news as reports on what politicians might do, may do, or should do, and we don't usually mention the murders, kidnappings, house fires, auto wrecks, celebrity crap, wacky fluff, and other nonsense that's pushed real news right out of the newscasts.
Disclaimer for dummies: Our front page is free from nudity, but we make no promise on profanity. If your surfing is monitored this site might not be safe for work, and you may be shocked, offended, or in trouble with your boss. A link doesn't imply that we agree with every sentence and every sentiment on every site we link to. We use our noggins, and suggest you use yours.
We always welcome comments from readers, and we're especially interested in hearing and considering different perspectives, so please don't be shy. All we ask is that you conduct yourself sanely and civilly, so consider yourself invited to speak your mind. Our email address and other info is on our contact page.
Please don't email us unless you're sending an original communication that you're not sending to anyone or everyone else. If you add us to your mailing list or chat group without asking us first, or if you send "Dear friend" newsletters, or "link exchange" form letters, or if you send a press release every time you add a post to your blog, you're a spammer and we'll soon block your emails. Also, as a matter of security, we don't open emails from strangers which include attachments or have any kind of programming imbedded, and we recommend a similar policy for others. If you're sending us an email, please send it in plain text only.
Our RSS feed of Unknown News headlines is updated whenever we update the site. Click the orange button for more information, or just get the feed at http://unknownnews.org/ RSSfeeds/dailyRSS.xml.
(Enormous and eternal thanksto Doug at mistersquirrel.net, for setting up our RSS feed.)
Our privacy policy has a page of its own, but the short and sweet version is: We're in favor of privacy. We make no effort to track or identify anything about visitors to our website. We never share, trade, or sell email addresses. We never send spam. We never send email, except in response to readers' queries. We never send (or open) attachments of any kind, and we delete un-opened any emails received with attachments.
Anything sent to Unknown News may be published. If you don't want it published, say so plainly. When we publish incoming emails, we edit out the sender's last name and email address — if we slip up (or if you want your full name and email address published) please let us know. Of course, if your email is unambiguously intended only to annoy, insult, or threaten us, we'll publish it with all the details and leave it on-line forever.
