Sept. 24, 2007:
Comcast fined whopping $4000 for airing commercial as news| | Excerpt: Cable giant Comcast violated the law by broadcasting video news releases without identifying them as sponsored programming, the Federal Communications Commission announced today. The ruling came in response to a complaint from Free Press and the Center for Media and Democracy, a media watchdog group focusing on VNRs.
Rulings such at these by the FCC have become increasingly less frequent over the past seven years. At the same time, the use of VNRs has become more wide spread.
In April of 2006, a study by [the Center for Media and Democracy] revealed that, over a ten month span, 77 television stations from all across the nation aired video news releases without informing their viewers even once that the reports were actually sponsored content. |
Sept. 13, 2007:
Media is usually lying when "explaining" Democrats options on war| | Excerpt: The Democratic leadership may believe--rightly or wrongly--that [ending the occupation of Iraq] would entail unacceptable political costs. But that's very different from being unable to affect policy. To insist, as many media outlets have, that the Constitution makes it impossible for Congress to stop the war obscures the actual choices facing the nation--by confusing "can't" with "won't." |
Sept. 5, 2007:
Top 10 big stories the US news media missed in the past year| | Excerpt: This year's Project Censored presents a chilling portrait of a newly empowered executive branch signing away civil liberties for the sake of an endless and amorphous war on terror. And for the most part, the major news media weren't paying attention.
"This year it seemed like civil rights just rose to the top," said Peter Phillips, the director of Project Censored, the annual media survey conducted by Sonoma State University researchers and students who spend the year patrolling obscure publications, national and international Web sites, and mainstream news outlets to compile the 25 most significant stories that were inadequately reported or essentially ignored. |
August 22, 2007:
NPR stands for Nuclear Paid Rallying| | Excerpt: In the six stories NPR has broadcast over the past 90 days about the future of nuclear power production in the U.S., NPR's sources included only three opponents of nuclear power plants, versus eight sources touting the safety, environmental friendliness and financial benefits of nuclear energy.
One factor that is relevant to NPR's cheerleading for nuclear power is its own financial links to the industry. According to NPR's website, between 1993 and 2005, the public radio service received between $250,000 and $500,000 from Constellation Energy, which belongs to Nustart Energy, a 10-company consortium pushing for new nuclear power plant construction. During the same period, another nuclear operator, Sempra Energy, donated between $50,000 and $100,000 to NPR. |
August 21, 2007:
Ex-CNN News Chief defends vetting commentators with Pentagon| | Excerpt: The former news chief of CNN is defending his decision to seek the Pentagon's approval of prospective CNN news analysts during the lead up to the Iraq war. Eason Jordan's comments have come under renewed scrutiny after being featured in Norman Solomon's film War Made Easy.
...
"I think it's important to have experts explain the war and to describe the military hardware, describe the tactics, talk about the strategy behind the conflict. I went to the Pentagon myself several times before the war started and met with important people there and said, for instance -- 'At CNN, here are the generals we're thinking of retaining to advise us on the air and off about the war' -- and we got a big thumbs-up on all of them. That was important."
Jordan, who now runs the IraqSlogger website, defended his actions last week. He said: "Employers routinely vet prospective employees with their previous employers. In these cases, we vetted retired generals to ensure they were experts in specific military and geographic areas. The generals were not vetted for political views."
Comment: Eason Jordan was the CNN exec who said he was surprised that Army PsyOps interns worked at his network. He later quit at CNN after suggesting that the U.S. military might be targeting journalists in Iraq, and then backpedaling to say he'd never meant that.
Beyond that, I know little about Eason, but I'm not surprised that an old-time, mainstream face runs IraqSlogger. We're skeptical when a new publication pops up seemingly from nowhere, and is almost immediately cited widely, indicating almost instant acceptance and respect. Sounds paranoid, I know, but from years on the fringe dating back to the on-paper era, trust me, it's utterly common to see well-funded, essentially corporate products try to position themselves as independent or counterculture efforts.
I have to assume that's what's behind the name IraqSlogger -- it almost shouts "outside the mainstream," but it is the mainstream... It was born just last December, and they say their goal is to be "the world’s premier Iraq-focused information source." When I went to poke around their website just now, I couldn't get to the content, as my way was blocked by pitches for subscriptions at $59.95 per month -- and that's a special discount price.
Seems to me that a company with a business strategy based on selling $60-a-month subscriptions to news about the Iraq war, is a company that's literally profiting from war, and literally has a vested interest in seeing that war extend onward. Helen & Harry PERMANENT LINK |
August 19, 2007:
Washington Post offers an overview of Karl Rove's White House crimes ... after Rove quits| | Excerpt: Rove, who announced last week that he is resigning from the White House at the end of August, pursued [political goals] far more systematically than his predecessors, according to interviews and documents reviewed by the Washington Post, enlisting political appointees at every level of government in a permanent campaign that was an integral part of his strategy to establish Republican electoral dominance.
Comment: This is a pretty good article, but -- wouldn't its have more useful, more journalism, if it had been written and published while Rove was on the government payroll at the White House, instead of after he quit? Helen & Harry PERMANENT LINK |
August 13, 2007:
Judge orders reporters to stop covering for Justice Department in anthrax case| | Excerpt: Five journalists must identify the government officials who leaked them details about a scientist under scrutiny in the 2001 anthrax attacks, a federal judge said Monday.
U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton ordered the reporters to cooperate with Steven J. Hatfill, who accused the Justice Department and FBI of violating the federal Privacy Act by giving the media information about the FBI's investigation of him.
Hatfill's attorneys want the reporters to reveal the identities of law enforcement officials who were cited anonymously in stories about the investigation.
Creating such a [journalistic] privilege in this case would have the "perverse effect" of handicapping a plaintiff whose good name was destroyed by government leaks, Walton said.
Comment: Yes, theoretically, it is really really bad that a court would force a journalist to give up their sources, and there will surely be some hand-wringing over this case by media critics.
But none of the mainstream discussions I've seen about this seem to make what seems to me to be an obvious distinction -- the distinction between a reporter protecting a source because that source is a whistleblower who could face reprisals, and a reporter protecting a source because that source is a powerful person in the government who wants to anonymously spread damaging, even untrue, information.
There is a fundamental difference between protecting the powerless from the powerful, and protecting the powerful's ability to squash the powerless. The laws protecting journalists were never meant to help them collude with the government to go after innocent people.
Once a reporter crosses that line from adversary to accomplice, they should lose the right to keep their sources confidential. At that point, is what they're doing even really journalism anymore? Madeline Zane PERMANENT LINK |
June 18, 2007:
ABC "reporter" becomes Pentagon spokesman| | Excerpt: The Pentagon will announce this week that Geoff Morrell, previously a White House correspondent for ABC News, has been hired as the Defense Department’s on-camera briefer… The official said that a working journalist was chosen by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates in an effort to improve press relations at a time when the administration is under pressure to show progress in Iraq.
Comment: Of course, if ABC's "working reporter" had been actually doing his job this whole time, the Pentagon would hate his guts too much to ever consider putting him on the payroll. Madeline Zane PERMANENT LINK |
May 30, 2007:
Facts, not fiction, about Venezuela's silencing of RCTV| | Excerpt: Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the Committee to Protect Journalists and members of the European Parliament, the U.S. Senate and even Chile's Congress have denounced the closure of RCTV, Venezuela's oldest private television network. Chavez's detractors got more ammunition Tuesday when the president included another opposition network, Globovision, among the "enemies of the homeland."
But the case of RCTV -- like most things involving Chavez -- has been caught up in a web of misinformation. While one side of the story is getting headlines around the world, the other is barely heard.
Comment: The mainstream American press is of course trying to make this sound like the anti-democratic censorship by an out-of-control dictator. But the network being shut down tried to overthrow the democratically elected government in a violent coup. Also, they constantly lie.
The network that was shut down in Venezuela is a little like Fox "News" ... if Fox executives actually tried to assassinate Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. Which honestly, I'd hardly put past them.
|
May 2, 2007: PC World editor resigns over apparent ad pressure| | Excerpt: Award-winning Editor-in-Chief Harry McCracken of PC World resigned Tuesday over disagreements with the magazine's publisher regarding stories critical of advertisers, according to sources. McCracken, reached Wednesday evening, confirmed that he resigned after 12 years at the magazine and 16 years at publisher International Data Group, over disagreements with management. ... Three sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told CNET News.com that McCracken informed staffers in an afternoon meeting Wednesday that he decided to resign because Colin Crawford, senior vice president, online, at IDG Communications, was pressuring him to avoid stories that were critical of major advertisers. |
April 13, 2007:
White House held meeting to pressure reporters on ‘division’ among war critics| | Excerpt: Last week, Bush administration officials invited senior congressional reporters to the White House and pressured them to increase their coverage of how Iraq war critics are “divided” over legislative strategy, multiple sources have confirmed with ThinkProgress.
The sources say White House officials pointed to examples of national political reporters who have highlighted such “division” and pressed the congressional reporters to follow suit. |
April 12, 2007:
Washington Post gives Cheney's daughter an op-ed column, without identifying her as VP's daughter| | Excerpt: Ms. Cheney's attack on Pelosi is eerily similar to the one launched on Pelosi recently by her father. So this Op ed looks like a clear effort to help him politically, by reiterating the attack, in however limited a way it does this in actual practice. What's more, this line of attack has a larger context: It is arguably designed to weaken Pelosi at a time when the House Dems she leads are locked in a critical political battle over Iraq with her dad's administration. And the WaPo editorial page has been one of the leading backers of the Bush-Cheney Iraq war. |
April 8, 2007:
Washington Post rewrites Reuters wire report to further Bush-Cheney line| | Excerpt: In other words, The Post uses the classic Judy Miller/Michael Gordon technique from the New York Times of passing on Bush Administration propaganda by ensuring that it is prominently placed -- together with the appropriate weasel words referring back to the original, completely unquestioned, government source -- so that there is no technical lying, although the intent is obviously to deceive (the last two honest paragraphs in the Reuters article have also gone missing). |
April 7, 2007:
MSNBC re-writes history of Iraq| | Excerpt: ... Amazingly, they’ve contrived to ignore Mohammed Mossadeq, the democratically elected prime minister of Iran who in 1953 was overthrown in a UK/CIA-backed coup, which installed the brutal and corrupt Shah in his place. The overthrow of Mossadeq is probably, together with the 1979 Islamic revolution, the seminal moment in the history of 20th century Iran, and MSNBC has just wiped it out for political convenience. Mossadeq had dared to nationalise the Iranian oil industry at the expense of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (now British Petroleum), and such defiance could obviously not be tolerated by the masters of the world. |
April 4, 2007:
Journalist jailed for refusing to testify finally freed| | Excerpt: After a record seven and a half months behind bars, San Francisco video blogger Josh Wolf has been released. Wolf walked out of a federal prison in Dublin, California Tuesday after prosecutors dropped a key demand that had made him the longest-jailed journalist for protecting a source in US history. Wolf was jailed on August 1st of last year when he refused to turn over video that he had shot of an anti-G8 demonstration in San Francisco. Wolf's release was okayed after prosecutors agreed to drop their effort to make him testify before a grand jury and identify protesters shown on his video. In return, Wolf posted the uncut video on his website, gave prosecutors a copy and testified he knew nothing about violent incidents at the protest. |
March 30, 2007:
New York Times changes, back-dates article after Wikipedia fact-checkers find error| | Excerpt: Is it common journalistic practice to change old articles like that? Is it considered ethically appropriate for a major newspaper to just pretend that they were right all along, and give neither credit nor acknowledgement for their error? |
March 15, 2007:
How Talking Points Memo beat the big boys on the U.S. Attorney story| | Excerpt: It's almost too perfect. A mainstream reporter mocks a story a blogger has been working to break, asserting that "it all makes perfect conspiratorial sense!", and that the blogger is "seeing broad partisan conspiracies where none likely exist," only to backtrack a few weeks later when the story explodes across the front pages of the major dailies. ...
Still, the image is great. While the mocking reporter, Time magazine's Washington bureau chief Jay Carney, was busy dumping on the story of U.S. Attorneys being fired across the country, Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo, and two of his reporters at his offshoot site, TPMuckracker.com, Paul Kiel and Justin Rood, were busy reporting, using a variety of sources that had been largely untapped by the mainstream press. |
Dec. 8, 2006:
How to acquiesce in a national catastrophe: a case study featuring the St. Louis Post-Dispatch
by Erich Vieth, Dangerous Intersection| | Excerpt: The Post-Dispatch is now willing to publish this wrenching picture of a grieving Iraqi father only because it can do so under the cover of recent official dissent, such as the recently announced results of the “Iraq Study Group.” You see, the “Iraq Study Group” is an official governmental power holding entity. What the Study Group says is now news. Even though it is saying the same things that “treasonous liberals” have been saying for several years. |
Nov. 27, 2006:
America's free press hangs in the balance| | Excerpt: "It is not limited to the press," said Eve Burton, general counsel at the Hearst Corporation. "If you look at the briefs they have filed all over the country, whether it is N.S.A. or wiretapping, or leaks to the press, everybody and everything that relates to the rights of the individual, they would like to have the right to make whatever decisions they want about whoever they want whenever they want."
And because the same administration that makes the laws selects the judges, this shift represents more than just one swing of the pendulum. What will be lost, she believes, are the kind of investigations where confidential sources play a critical role.
"You won't get the Watergate story, you won't get the Pentagon Papers," she said. |
Nov. 8, 2006:
Newspaper lies on page one. I know. I was there.
by Herb Ruhs, MD, Unknown News| | Excerpt: What the headline should have said was, "Evidence implicates government in mass murder of citizens." But then the staff at the Press Democrat would not be keeping their jobs, paying their mortgages, providing health insurance for their families or saving for retirement if they authored such headlines, would they? |
Oct. 18, 2006:
How to make a power grab seem mundane
by James Bovard, Editor & Publisher| | Comment: As George Bush or Dick Cheney urge and enact laws to authorize torture, sidestep America's system of justice, play tic-tac-toe on the Bill of Rights, and circumvent the Constitution, America's newspapers report it as if the President had signed a proclamation of Yogurt Day. Rebecca PERMANENT LINK |
Oct. 9, 2006:
Journalists from Newsweek, Atlantic Monthly advised White House on post-9/11 talking points| | Excerpt: On Nov. 29, 2001, a dozen policy makers, Middle East experts and members of influential policy research organizations gathered in Virginia at the request of Paul D. Wolfowitz, then the deputy secretary of defense. Their objective was to produce a report for President Bush and his cabinet outlining a strategy for dealing with Afghanistan and the Middle East in the aftermath of 9/11.
What was more unusual, Mr. Woodward reveals, was the presence of journalists at the meeting. Fareed Zakaria, the editor of Newsweek International and a Newsweek columnist, and Robert D. Kaplan, now a national correspondent for The Atlantic Monthly, attended the meeting and, according to Mr. Kaplan, signed confidentiality agreements not to discuss what happened.
Comment: As an aside, it's a little funny that the report of this unethical trampling of the line between government agent and journalist is brought to you by Bob Woodward, who bravely stopped cozying up to the Bush administration when he realized he could sell more books that way ... and that the New York Times buried this story in their "Media and Advertising" section. Madeline Zane PERMANENT LINK |
Oct. 3, 2006:
Reporter has been jailed for five years
by Joel Campagna, Committee to Protect Journalists| | Excerpt: Championed as a prisoner of conscience on Al-Jazeera though virtually unknown in U.S. media circles, al-Haj is the only confirmed journalist now imprisoned at Guantanamo. The U.S. military alleges that he worked as a financial courier for Chechen rebels, and that he assisted al-Qaeda and extremist figures. In one taped message, Osama bin Laden purportedly called for his release.
Yet al-Haj has been held for nearly five years on the basis of secret evidence; he has not been convicted or even charged with a crime. Until this year -- when an Associated Press lawsuit prompted the Pentagon to identify the detainees -- the military would not acknowledge al-Haj was in custody. Al-Haj’s lawyer, who has been barred from attending his client’s hearings, has called the allegations baseless and the justice system at Guantanamo a sham. |
Sept. 15, 2006:
Ten anti-Castro "journalists" in Florida on US government payroll| | Excerpt: During the Mercosur summit in Argentina, WJAN-TV South Florida reporter, Manuel Cao, asked Cuban President Fidel Castro why his government didn't allow a prominent doctor and dissident to leave the country. Quick as lightning, Castro shot back, "Who pays you?"
Now we find that Cao's paymaster was the US government: he received $10,400 in payments so far this year. Cao is one among 10 South Florida journalists to have been found accepting money in exchange for touting propaganda intended to undermine the Cuban government via Radio and TV Marti (both bankrolled by the US government to the tune of $37 million to broadcast anti-Cuban propaganda from the States onto Cuban soil).
The news mercenaries' covert employer was exposed by documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. Three were fired from El Nuevo Herald, the Spanish-language sister paper of the Miami Herald: columnist Pablo Alfonso, staff reporter Wilfredo Cancio and freelancer Olga Connor. |
Aug. 29, 2006:
Terrorists are manipulating US media, says Rumsfeld| | Excerpt: "What bothers me the most is how clever the enemy is," he continued, launching an extensive broadside at Islamic extremist groups which he said are trying to undermine Western support for the war on terror.
"They are actively manipulating the media in this country" by, for example, falsely blaming U.S. troops for civilian deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan, he said.
Comment: Will any American reporter challenge Rumsfeld's absolutely delusional propaganda?
He names no names, cites no examples, offers no evidence because, of course, anyone who's brighter than a dustmop knows "Islamic extremist groups" have no viable access to American media.
But pathological liars in the Bush administration can say anything they wish, even outrageous and obvious lies like this, knowing the US media will report it virtually without question. Helen & Harry PERMANENT LINK |
Aug. 24, 2006:
Judge: All journalists can be spied on without warrants| | Excerpt: Journalism took another hit yesterday when a federal judge ruled the government could legitimately tap the phones of anyone handling "material that is not generally available to the public." As one observer noted, that's just what a free press traffics. "If the press could only report on 'information generally available to the public,' there would be no need for a press," secrecy expert Steven Aftergood told JTA. |
July 17, 2006:
Specter offers legislation authorizing massive unwarranted, unchecked surveillance of Americans| | Excerpt: All the newspaper headlines all say that the spying programs are now going to be overseen by the FISA court but in fact, the truth is almost exactly the opposite.
The new legislation doesn't strengthen judicial oversight, it more or less removes it entirely.
... All this legislation does is effectively legalize the surveillance programs that are already in place. |
July 6, 2006:
Tax dollars to fund study on restricting public data| | Excerpt: The federal government will pay a Texas law school $1 million to do research aimed at rolling back the amount of sensitive data available to the press and public through freedom-of-information requests.
... Jeffrey Addicott, a professor at the law school, said he will use that research to produce a national "model statute" that state legislatures and Congress could adopt to ensure that potentially dangerous information "stays out of the hands of the bad guys."
"There's the public's right to know, but how much?" said Addicott, a former legal adviser in the Army's Special Forces. |
June 30, 2006:
House resolution calls for end to American journalism| | Excerpt: The resolution, which passed 227-183, with 17 Democrats joining nearly all House Republicans in voting for it, praises the financial tracking program as a success that respects civil liberties and, without mentioning any newspaper by name, says Congress "expects the cooperation of all news media organizations."
Comment: The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. Thomas Jefferson PERMANENT LINK
In joint editorial, NY Times and LA Times explain free press
Excerpt: "We understand that honorable people may disagree with any of these choices -- to publish or not to publish. But making those decisions is the responsibility that falls to editors, a corollary to the great gift of our independence. It is not a responsibility we take lightly. And it is not one we can surrender to the government."
Comment: Helen & Harry PERMANENT LINK |
June 22, 2006:
Newspapers reject government request to kill story| | Excerpt: The New York Times and Los Angeles Times on Friday published a major story on government surveillance of private banking records over the objections of the Bush administration.
The same team that produced the Pulitzer-winning National Security Agency (NSA) "domestic spying" program, James Risen and Eric Lichtblau, put together the New York Times' piece. In the middle of the article, they reveal that the White House had asked the paper not to run it. This had happened with the NSA story as well, and the Times put off running the pair's key findings for a year.
"We know the terrorists pay attention to our strategy to fight them, and now have another piece of the puzzle of how we are fighting them," Dana Perino, a White House spokesman said late Thursday. "We also know they adapt their methods, which increases the challenge to our intelligence and law enforcement officials."
Perino added: "The president is concerned that once again The New York Times has chosen to expose a classified program that is working to protect our citizens."
The Risen-Lichtblau story reveals: "The Bush administration has made no secret of its campaign to disrupt terrorist financing, and President Bush, Treasury officials and others have spoken publicly about those efforts. Administration officials, however, asked The New York Times not to publish this article, saying that disclosure of the Swift program could jeopardize its effectiveness. They also enlisted several current and former officials, both Democrat and Republican, to vouch for its value.
"Bill Keller, the newspaper's executive editor, said: 'We have listened closely to the administration's arguments for withholding this information, and given them the most serious and respectful consideration. We remain convinced that the administration's extraordinary access to this vast repository of international financial data, however carefully targeted use of it may be, is a matter of public interest.'
Comment: Here's hoping that something was learned from the complaints received at the Times after they sat on the earlier story for more than a year. Helen & Harry PERMANENT LINK |
June 22, 2006:
Republican Chair of Homeland Security calls for criminal charges against New York Times| | Excerpt: The chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee urged the Bush administration Sunday to seek criminal charges against The New York Times for reporting on a secret financial-monitoring program used to trace terrorists.
Rep. Peter King blasted the newspaper's decision last week to report that the Treasury Department was working with the CIA to examine messages within a massive international database of money-transfer records.
"I am asking the Attorney General to begin an investigation and prosecution of The New York Times -- the reporters, the editors and the publisher," said Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y. "We're at war, and for the Times to release information about secret operations and methods is treasonous." |
June 21, 2006:
Author: U.S. purposely bombed Al-Jazeera office in 2001| | Excerpt: "On November 13, a hectic day when Kabul fell to the Northern Alliance and there were celebrations in the streets of the city, a U.S. missile obliterated Al-Jazeera's office," Suskind wrote in the book The One Percent Doctrine. Inside the CIA and White House there was satisfaction that a message had been sent to Al-Jazeera ... The Pentagon asserted then, without providing additional detail, that the office was a "known al-Qaeda facility" and that the U.S. military did not know that the space was being used by Al-Jazeera. |
June 13, 2006:
White House lied to public, but Rove saved his hide by coming clean to FBI| | Comment: This is probably the end of this entirely sordid episode, and the AP's reporter has summed things up with what seems to me a fairly fair recap -- with one glaring but utterly ordinary exception:
Like virtually all mainstream reporters, AP's Pete Yost is congenitally incapable of typing the words "lie," "lied," or "liar" when referring to anyone in the White House.
So we'll help... Helen & Harry PERMANENT LINK |
May 22, 2006:
Attorney General reminds reporters, they can be prosecuted for reporting Bush administration criminal activities | | Comment: Gonzales' threat doesn't need an interpreter: It's pretty much point blank.
... The next time an administration insider sees an illegal, immoral, or unConstitutional government policy, something more than merely conscience will stand in any whistleblower's way.
Now, instead of merely presenting facts and documentation to a reporter, the reporter and his/her editor will have their own questions to answer:
Am I willing to face prison for reporting this news? Helen & Harry LINK |
May 8, 2006:
The USDA's talking points on Iraq
by Joshua Holland, AlterNet| | Excerpt: Career appointees at the Department of Agriculture were stunned last week to receive e-mailed instructions that include Bush administration "talking points" -- saying things such as "President Bush has a clear strategy for victory in Iraq" -- in every speech they give for the department.
"The President has requested that all members of his cabinet and sub-cabinet incorporate message points on the Global War on Terror into speeches, including specific examples of what each agency is doing to aid the reconstruction of Iraq," the May 2 e-mail from USDA speechwriter Heather Vaughn began. [...] |
April 29, 2006:
When the questions get interesting, coverage of kids' photo-op with Attorney General is cut short| | Comment: Are other Washington Post reporters as easily steered away, when anything interesting or unexpected happens?
Helen & Harry LINK |
April 24, 2006: Iraqi actor denied entry to US for premiere of 9/11 propaganda film| | Comment: I guess it doesn't matter that there are serious doubts that the "Let's roll" story portrayed in this movie ever actually happened, because most Americans believe it happened, and this possibly-fictional bravery inspires us all to act like heroes every day. I mean, just look how we heroically keep innocent brown people detained at our borders for no good reason.
This Iraqi actor is lucky we haven't bravely killed him in our heroic illegal war or courageously tortured him in our freedom gulags.
Madeline Zane LINK |
April 20, 2006:
Woman arrested for speaking freely after Bush call for "freedom... to speak freely" CNN calls it "a blemish" on Chinese leader's visit| | Excerpt: At an outdoor ceremony, Bush told Chinese President Hu Jintao at the White House, "China has become successful because the Chinese people are experience the freedom to buy, and to sell, and to produce -- and China can grow even more successful by allowing the Chinese people the freedom to assemble, to speak freely, and to worship."
Seconds later, one of the people assembled on the White House south lawn actually tried to speak freely right here in America -- about both the lack of free speech and religious freedom in China.
... She shouted in heavily accented English, "President Bush: Stop him from killing" and, "President Bush, stop him from persecuting the Falun Gong."
Bush, standing next to Hu, leaned over and whispered a comment to the Chinese leader, who paused briefly when the shouting began and then resumed his remarks.
A photographer who was standing next to the protester tried momentarily to quiet her by putting his hand in front of her mouth.
Watching the scene unfold, we felt like we were living on a different planet from the folks at CNN. ... For while we viewed the protestor as a hero, the talking heads on the global cable network were appalled at what they covered as a security breach.
CNN's correspondent on the scene, Elaine Quijano, promptly called the heckler "a blemish, if you will, on this visit." The host, Frederica Whitfield, promptly picked up on that, calling the actual exercise of free speech "an embarrassing moment for the White House." |
April 13, 2006:
The Christians you can't see on TV by Ron Buford, The Capital Times [Madison, WI]
April 10, 2006:
"US home audience" is target of American propaganda about al Qaeda leader Zarqawi
March 22, 2006:
USA Today uncritically reported Bush's denial that he linked Iraq with 9/11 attacks| | Excerpt: In fact, Bush did claim such a connection existed, often generally and specifically in a letter to Congress at the start of the war. |
March 18, 2006:
Bush using straw-man arguments in speeches| | Excerpt: "It's such a phenomenal hole in the national debate that you can have arguments with nonexistent people. All politicians try to get away with this to a certain extent. What's striking here is how much this administration rests on a foundation of this kind of stuff." |
March 17, 2006:
Federal agents posed as Fox News reporters| |
Comment: Does the name Daniel Pearl ring a bell?
When bad guys begin believing that 'reporters' might be police or federal agents, it can make real reporters the targets of violence, or assassination. H&HH LINK |
March 15, 2006:
TV newscasts adopt product placements
March 15, 2006:
NBC anchors apparantly violating NBC ethics policy, MSNBC President Rick Kaplan apparantly lying about it
March 14, 2006:
Railroading of Milosevic ends with his unlikely death
by John Laughland, The Guardian
March 5, 2006: White House targets US reporters for prosecution
March 2, 2006:
Reporting on Bush pre-Katrina briefing, NY Times, Washington Post, USA Today entirely forgot Bush claim that no one anticipated levee breaches| | Excerpt: ... none of the reports mentioned that these new accounts of government deliberations before the storm further contradict the claim Bush made on ABC's Good Morning America several days after the storm hit that "I don't think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees," which was debunked even at the time. |
Feb. 26, 2006:
White House lied about Scottish cop's injuries from Bush bicycle crash| | Excerpt: John Scott, a human rights lawyer, said: "There's certainly enough in this account for a charge of careless driving. Anyone else would have been warned for dangerous driving.
"I have had clients who have been charged with assaulting a police officer for less than this. The issue of how long the police officer was out of action for is also important. He was away from work for 14 weeks, and that would normally be very significant in a case like this."
According to day-after press reports on July 7th, Bush blamed wet pavement and high speed for the fall. "We were flying,'' Bush said at a press conference in Gleneagles.
Comment: In reality, Bush carelessly took his hands off the bike's handlebars, causing the accident, and injuring a policeman so seriously he missed more than three months' work.
There is no matter so trivial that the Bush administration won't lie about it. H&HH LINK
... None of the coverage at the time suggested the constable was hurt beyond the "minor" injury, and the incident was soon forgotten. |
Feb. 17, 2006: Rumsfeld calls for US-controlled worldwide propaganda networks
Feb. 16, 2006:
Media helps cover up questions about Cheney shooting
Feb. 15, 2006:
What liberal media? Sunday talk shows overwhelmingly favor right, study shows| | Excerpt: For example, study found that in 2005, Republicans and conservatives held a dramatic advantage in guestbookings for these shows, outnumbering Democrats and progressives by a margin of 58 percent to 42 percent. |
Feb. 6, 2006:
NSA won't reveal its relationship with Reuters and Associated Press| | Excerpt: In a letter dated February 2, 2006 and signed by its Director of Policy, the NSA revealed that it has contracts with at least two of the major mainstream press wire services, Reuters and Associated Press (AP), and that the information that it had received from these wire services could not be released to the public. Here in part is what the letter said:
“Information provided to NSA by Reuters and AP is protected against disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Section 552(b)(4). The NSA contract with these companies precludes our release of this information. Violation of these contracts could prevent the government from obtaining similar information in the future.” |
Jan. 25, 2006:
Principal will remove "obscene, inappropriate, libelous and disruptive" material from school paper
Jan. 23, 2006:
Chavez' populist remarks edited to look like anti-Semitism
Jan. 21, 2006:
Reality series cancelled without airing when gay-headed family wins
Jan. 13, 2006:
Columnist Fumento fired in another propaganda scandal| | Summary: Scripps Howard News Service has fired columnist Michael Fumento, who always wrote rah-rah stuff about biotech products from Monsanto, for not revealing he had taken $60,000 from Monsanto. In other recent columns, Fumento had criticized Rep John Murtha and Cindy Sheehan ... |
Jan. 10, 2006:
US Army hires public relations firm to craft propaganda for distribution to weblogs| | Excerpt: William Arkin of the Washington Post writes that according to his sources, the content of these editorials is not going to be “the nitty gritty of deployments and living conditions overseas,” but instead “an official counter to the perceived unwillingness of the mainstream media to report the ‘good news’ from Iraq and the war on terror.” |
Dec. 30, 2005:
Pentagon claims policy of paying for propaganda is legal
Dec. 30, 2005:
Associated Press cuts ties to "journalist" funded by US government
Dec. 16, 2005:
Abramoff owned syndicated Cato columnist| | Excerpt: Doug Bandow, who writes a syndicated column for Copley News Service, told BusinessWeek Online that he had accepted money from Abramoff for writing between 12 and 24 articles over a period of years, beginning in the mid '90s.
After receiving BusinessWeek Online's inquiries about the possibility of payments, Cato Communications Director Jamie Dettmer said the think-tank determined that Bandow "engaged in what we consider to be inappropriate behavior and he considers to be a lapse in judgment" and accepted his resignation. "Cato has an excellent reputation for integrity, and we're zealous in guarding that," Dettmer said. |
Dec. 7, 2005:
Journalists are now 'soul searching' after 'playing dead' since 9/11, says Helen Thomas
Dec. 7, 2005:
The terror verdict TV networks ignored
by Eric Boehlert, The Huffington Post| | Excerpt: When then-Attorney General John Ashcroft personally announced the Al-Arian indictment on Feb. 20, 2003, in a press conference carried live on CNN (Ashcroft tagged Al-Arian the North American leader of Palestinian Islamic Jihad), the story garnered a wave of excited media attention. ABC's "World News Tonight" led that night's newscast with the Al Arian arrest. Both NBC and CBS also gave the story prominent play that evening. But last night, in the wake of Al-Arian's acquittal, it was a different story. Neither ABC, CBS nor NBC led with the terror case on their evening newscasts. None of them slotted it second or third either. In fact, according to TVEyes, the 24-hour monitor system, none of networks reported the acquittal at all. Raise your hand if you think the nets would have covered the trial's conclusion if the jury had returned with a guilty verdict in what the government had hyped as a centerpiece to its War on Terror. |
Dec. 5, 2005:
NBC anchor Williams: Bush administration has "the right" to buy media coverage| | Excerpt: Appearing on the December 4 edition of CNN's Reliable Sources, NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams told host Howard Kurtz that the Bush administration has "the right" to pay a columnist to tout its views in his column. Williams also condoned the "politiciz[ation]" of programming on the Public Broadcasting System (PBS).
|
Nov. 13, 2005:
Secretive firm, headed by Democrat activist, helps U.S. wage worldwide propaganda onslaught
Nov. 9, 2005:
White House alters official transcript of press conference
Oct. 14, 2005: Katrina: Media lied, people died by Michael Fumento, Tech Central Station
Oct. 12, 2005:
Parade Magazine's lie about ChavezExcerpt: On October 9, Parade magazine -- the Sunday newspaper supplement with a circulation of 34.5 million, making it the country's most widely distributed magazine -- published an inaccurate smear against Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. The smear, appearing in the Q&A column "Walter Scott's Personality Parade," was a response to a letter writer who wanted to know "where Fidel Castro gets the dough to shore up his bankrupt regime." Scott's full answer was:
"In the wake of the collapse of the USSR, which bankrolled him to the tune of $4 billion a year, Castro has turned to Hugo Chavez, Marxist president of Venezuela, the world's fifth-largest oil exporter. In addition to shoring up Castro, he's funding revolutionaries and terrorists throughout Latin America."
Oct. 10, 2005:
Firm that produced illegal Medicare propaganda gets contract to "educate" seniors on prescription drug plan
Oct. 6, 2005:
Did a reporter with GOP ties suppress a story that could have cost Bush the White House?
Salon requires non-subscribers to view a brief advertisement
Sept. 26, 2005:
Superdome, Convention Center deaths were wildly exaggerated
Sept. 11, 2005:
Experts question how much looting and mayhem really took place in New Orleans
Sept. 9 , 2005:
Media spreads at least eight Bush administration lies about Katrina
Aug. 19, 2005:
China and Russia in joint military maneuvers, and AP doesn't want you to know why
July 8, 2005:
Fox anchor hopes to profit from attacks on London
June 17, 2005:
Bush administration back in the fake-news producing business
June 17, 2005:
Justifying the silence on Downing Street Memos
June 7, 2005:
Fourth-largest U.S. bank lied about owning slaves
May 31, 2005:
Jesus, is this news?
by Susan J. Douglas, In These Times
May 10, 2005:
Study of U.S. war atrocities remains unpublished in America
May 5, 2005:
Network accepts hate ads, rejects ads for tolerance
May 4, 2005:
Unidentified Marine in videotaped Iraq mosque shooting won't face court-martial
May 3, 2005:
Mainstream media: Completely on board with Bush administration lies by Helen & Harry Highwater, Unknown News
May 1, 2005:
The news we should be seeing on TV by Mello Cat, Unknown News
April 30, 2005:
Blogger is first journalist to seek Bush FBI filesExcerpt: “How it could it be that during the most important election of the past half century, the supposed liberal media could devote resources, ink and airtime to the FBI files of only one of the two major contenders for the White House, and totally ignore what the agency may have on the other candidate?” he penned.
“To their shame, no mainstream news outlet, liberal or conservative, bothered to investigate what the FBI has in its archives on Bush or efforts to obtain his file,” he added.
April 24, 2005:
New York Times distortion up close and personal
'
April 24, 2005:
Prostitute-reporter visited White House on days when there was no press conference
April 21, 2005:
CNN distributes Bush's fake newsExcerpt: More than 800 American stations pay a division of CNN -- which is called CNN Newsource -- to send them stories from CNN and its affiliates. But that's not all CNN Newsource does. Many public relations firms also pay it to distribute "video news releases" from their clients -- including the U.S. government.
April 21, 2005:
Time Magazine offers kiss-ass profile of Anna Coulter
April 18, 2005:
Washington Post offers kiss-ass profile of Trent Lott
April 18, 2005:
When media dogs don't bark
April 15, 2005:
Further adventures in propaganda Pentagon funds Iraq junket for talk radio hosts
April 7, 2005:
The flawed report on Dan RatherExcerpt: Lost in the commotion over the authenticity of the documents is that the underlying facts of Rather’s 60 Minutes report are substantially true. Bush did not take the physical exam required of all pilots; his superiors gave him the benefit of any doubt; he did receive special treatment and Lieutenant Colonel Jerry Killian, Bush’s commanding officer, was unhappy with the loss of ANG’s investment in him when Bush informed Killian he was leaving for Alabama. Before the broadcast, Mary Mapes, the CBS producer of the program, confirmed the facts in the documents with retired Major General Bobby Hodges, who had been Killian’s superior in the ANG. Later Hodges told the panel he did not think the documents were authentic, but did not disagree that the facts were substantially correct.
March 24 & 28, 2005:
Guckert/Gannon: Also a fake MarineGuckert/Gannon: These are your lives
March 14, 2005:
Feds produce hundreds of propaganda "news" videos
Feb. 28, 2005:
Pulitzer-winner quits journalism with fiery letter of resignation
Feb. 22, 2005:
Principal yanks high school newspaper over "controversial" article on virginity
Feb. 20, 2005:
Gannon/Guckertgate The mole, the US media and a White House coup
Feb. 19, 2005:
When real news debunks fake newsExcerpt: By my count, "Jeff Gannon" is now at least the sixth "journalist" to have been a propagandist on the payroll of either the Bush administration or a barely arms-length ally like Talon News while simultaneously appearing in print or broadcast forums that purport to be real news. Of these six, two have been syndicated newspaper columnists paid by the Department of Health and Human Services to promote the administration's "marriage" initiatives. The other four have played real newsmen on TV. Before Guckert and Armstrong Williams, the talking head paid $240,000 by the Department of Education, there were Karen Ryan and Alberto Garcia. Let us not forget these pioneers - the Woodward and Bernstein of fake news. They starred in bogus reports pretending to "sort through the details" of the administration's Medicare prescription-drug plan in 2004. Such "reports," some of which found their way into news packages distributed to local stations by CNN, appeared in more than 50 news broadcasts around the country and have now been deemed illegal "covert propaganda" by the Government Accountability Office.
Feb. 18, 2005:
Gannon reportedly knew about Iraq attack four hours before it happened
Feb. 11, 2005:
With the Bush administration, everything is a lie by Billie Newman, Unknown News
Feb. 10, 2005:
White House 'reporter' Jeff Gannon is really James D. GuckertExcerpt: Jeff Gannon, the controversial White House correspondent for the obscure, conservative Web site Talon News who resigned from his job Tuesday, confirmed late Wednesday, in a phone interview with National Public Radio, that he has been using a false name. A few hours later, Howard Kurtz, writing in The Washington Post, confirmed earlier tips, arising from liberal blogs, that the reporter's real name is indeed James D. Guckert.
Despite the ruse, "Gannon" still managed to gain access to many White House briefings and was one of the few reporters allowed to ask President Bush a (very friendly) question at a press conference two weeks ago.
NPR reported Wednesday that when Gannon was turned down for Capitol Hill credentials -- a move first reported by E&P last week -- he had used the name James Guckert. He admitted to NPR that Gannon was not his real name, and left it at that.
This "begs further investigation," James Pinkerton, a media critic for Fox News, told the online magazine Salon.com. He recalled that in the six years he worked for Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush, the White House was "strict about who got in. It's inconceivable to me that the White House, especially after 9/11, gives credentials to people without doing a background check. ... If [Gannon] was walking around the White House with a pass that had a different name on it than his real name, that's pretty remarkable."
# Actually it is really slimy and so fits the current White House trend. But what, if anything, will the "official" media do? Probably nothing, since they are currently still licking the President's butt and eating his shit like it was some sort of culinary delicacy. =Chris M.=
Feb. 9, 2005:
'Jeff Gannon' and l'affaire Plame: Summary of CIA leakExcerpt: This diary condenses the huge and detailed timeline laid out in the previous diary "Plame leak timeline II".
It lays the case for the leak of the classified 2002 CIA memo to [phony White House reporter] Jeff Gannon [whose actual name may vary].
Feb. 9, 2005:
Finding the foot behind the "Talon"Excerpt: Much is being made of the 'resignation' of Jeff Gannon, a faux-journalist suspected of being a conservative shill in the White House press briefing room and now also believed to have some ties to lifestyles that don't jibe with the party lines.
But what about Talon News? According to whois records, talonnews.com is owned by Endeavor Media Group in Houston TX -- a company with a PO Box and a fake phone number listing. When checking on endeavormediagroup.com in whois, the same info comes up -- but endeavormediagroup.com is a Forbidden domain. Also, googling "endeavor media group" gets you nothing. It's like this company doesn't exist.
And it didn't -- until Monday. ...
Feb. 7, 2005:
New York Times spiked exposé of Bush's alleged debate cheatingExcerpt: Ben Bagdikian, retired dean of U.C. Berkeley's journalism school, held Bob Woodward's current position at the Washington Post during the time of the Pentagon Papers. Informed of the fate of the bulge story and Nelson's photos at the three newspapers, he said:
"I cannot imagine a paper I worked for turning down a story like this before an election. This was credible photographic evidence not about breaking the rules, but of a total lack of integrity on the part of the president, evidence that he'd cheated in the debate, and also of a lack of confidence in his ability on the part of his campaign. I'm shocked to hear top management decided not to run such a story."
Feb. 4, 2005:
'Cash for commentary' is business as usual
Feb. 2, 2005:
Republican activist gets White House credentials as reporter, asks 'softball' questions at press conferences
Jan. 30, 2005:
Bush administration assigns "minders" for reporters
Jan. 30, 2005:
U.S. students say press freedoms go too far ... or do they?
Jan. 28, 2005:
Second and third conservative columnists took payola for pro-Bush propaganda
Jan. 27, 2005:
Wondering why news is ignoredExcerpt: When more than 200,000 people died in a tsunami caused by an Asian earthquake in December, the immediate reaction in the United States was an outpouring of grief and philanthropy, prompted by extensive coverage in the news media.
Two months earlier, the reaction in the United States to news of another large-scale human tragedy was much quieter. In late October, a study was published in The Lancet, a prestigious British medical journal, concluding that about 100,000 civilians had been killed in Iraq since it was invaded by a United States-led coalition in March 2003. On the eve of a contentious presidential election -- fought in part over U.S. policy on Iraq -- many American newspapers and television news programs ignored the study or buried reports about it far from the top headlines.
Jan. 25, 2005:
Is reality television? by HappySysiphus, Unknown News
Jan. 25, 2005:
The increasingly irrelevant mainstream news by Carol Rawle, Unknown News
Jan. 25, 2005:
Military still lying about Guantanamo suicide attempts And media still won't question obvious lies
Jan. 18, 2005:
A televisual fairyland by George Monbiot, The Guardian
Jan. 17, 2005:
Frustrated reporter turns to trucking
Jan. 15, 2005:
Journalism's vacation from the truth by Frank Rich, The New York Times
Jan. 10, 2005:
On-the-take journalist Armstrong Williams
Jan. 5, 2005:
The news (as seen on TV)
Dec. 30, 2004:
The gist and the details Dialogue with Unknown News
Dec. 27, 2004:
CIA won't answer inquiries about torture
Dec. 27, 2004:
No news from Fallujah
Dec. 22, 2004:
TV network critical of U.S. policy banned in America by State Dept
Dec. 9, 2004:
U.S. media still hiding bad news from Americans
Dec. 7, 2004:
Nation editor spars with reporter over election questions (Why, it's David Corn -- who also dismissed questions about September 11)
Dec. 6, 2004:
Bloggers blur the definition of reporters' privilege
Oct. 16, 2004:
Comedian Jon Stewart blasts Crossfire on Crossfire
Aug. 19, 2004:
Wen Ho Lee reporters held in contempt
Aug. 12, 2004:
Washington Post follows New York Times with apology for war cheerleading
Aug. 3, 2004:
Bush-Cheney staff seeks info on reporter's race
July 12, 2004:
AP tours Guantanamo Bay detention center: Crap floats downstream from Guantanamo by The Red Wolf, Unknown News
July 7, 2004:
Truth, distortion compete at Knight-Ridder: A look at key points in news coverage of Fahrenheit 9/11 by Madeline Zane, Unknown News
July 3, 2004:
15 months after the lie, Los Angeles Times catches on: Toppling of Saddam statue was staged
June 28, 2004:
White House complains to Irish embassy about reporter's "disrespectful" interview
June 8, 2004:
The real legacy of Ronald Reagan by Madeline Zane, Unknown News
May 24, 2004:
When will reporters call Bush a liar? by Jason Sazman, The Topeka [KS] Capital-Journal
May 14, 2004:
Foreign reporter detained, deported
May 11, 2004:
Torture or abuse? Fair and balanced reporting from AP
April 22, 2004:
American fired for photo of coffins
April 19, 2004:
September 11, 2001:
Questions that'll never be asked ... by Tess Ellis, Unknown News
April 16, 2004:
CIA cancels agent's speech when newspaper won't go along with phony secrecy
March 30, 2004:
Another reporter apologizes for Iraq coverage
March 22, 2004:
After 2 ½ years asleep, Wall Street Journal notices a few oddities about Sept. 11
March 19, 2004:
Reporter apologizes for Iraq coverage by Harvey Rice, Houston Chronicle
March 14, 2004:
Bush administration hired fake reporters to "report" on Medicare bill
Feb. 28, 2004:
Pentagon launches new propaganda network
Feb. 9, 2004:
Reuters outsources journalists
Feb. 3, 2004:
Court says reporters have no right to cover troops
Feb. 1, 2004:
Watergate was nothing compared to this by Eric Margolis, Toronto Sun
Jan. 27, 2004:
Election Watch: Michael Moore, and The Kansas City Star
Jan. 20, 2004:
Reporters Without Borders accuses military over killings
Jan. 15, 2004:
Deputy pleads guilty to child abuse
Jan. 7, 2004:
Arms cache in Texas leads to convictions but few answers
Dec. 22, 2003:
Does anyone remember liberty and justice for all? by Tess Ellis, Unknown News
Dec. 11, 2003:
Mariani lawsuit mentioned
in mainstream media (two weeks after it's filed)
Nov. 17, 2003:
Editor interrogated for nearly 15 hours
Nov. 6, 2003:
Los Angeles Times memo orders reporters to fudge the truth by Helen & Harry Highwater, Unknown News
Oct. 26, 2003:
A review of The Early Show on CBS-TV by Kathy Fisher, Unknown News
Oct. 21, 2003:
Bush bans coverage of U.S. corpses arriving from Iraq
Oct. 19, 2003:
Media notices Bush-Nazi connection
Oct. 9, 2003:
Rule against journalism at Guantánamo? Yes, no, and maybe.
Oct. 1, 2003:
Cop threatens reporter who snapped picture of illegally parked cruiser
Sept. 17, 2003:
NPR reporter has CIA connection at home
by Grandma, Unknown News
Sept. 3, 2003:
My bias about media bias by Nick Sharp, Unknown News
July 25, 2003:
Jessica Lynch is no Audie Murphy! by Mike W., Unknown News
June 22, 2003:
Supreme Court won't re-open case that set precedent for "state secrets" If government wants to lie in court, they can, and it's legal by Hal C., Unknown News
June 15, 2003:
US media caved in to the Bush agenda by Eric Margolis, Toronto Sun
May 26, 2003:
If it's in the London Daily Telegraph, read it with a grain of saltExcerpt: A startling streak of headline-making reports came from one newspaper during the war with Iraq -- a newspaper with Henry Kissinger and Richard Perle as Directors.
Feb. 15, 2003:
Police snipers snipped from New York Times by Helen & Harry Highwater, Unknown News
Aug. 19, 2002:
Corporate media makes pathetic case for invading Iraq by Cheryl Seal, Unknown News
June 21, 2002:
How to sew a straightjacket:
A look at how the mainstream media behemoths collude with Bush to wag the dog by Cheryl Seal, Unknown News
March 1, 2002:
Why a reporter is dead by Helen & Harry Highwater, Unknown News
Feb. 25, 2002:
Comparative analysis of Woodward's Washington Post 9/11 article with alternative media by The Blue Rajah, Unknown News
Sept. 14, 2001:
Is this journalism, or is this cheerleading?| | Excerpt: ... [Thursday] morning Flag War broke out among the cable news networks. CNN declared itself the victor, having put its animated American flag near the bottom of the screen at midnight Wednesday; MSNBC and Fox News Channel followed suit yesterday morning.
"I'm thrilled we were the first network to put up the American flag," said Garth Ancier, vice president of programming at Turner Broadcasting Systems, which includes CNN.
"We all started hearing about friends and neighbors who were buying flags. Walter Isaacson said he didn't want anyone getting an American flag on before us; he ordered the animated American flag [Wednesday] night." |
April 15, 2000:
US Army Psy-ops personnel assigned to CNN, NPR
March 12, 1997:
Waco: Machine-gunning the truth by Doug Holland, Anderson Valley Advertiser
From our files:
A sorry excuse for news:
The making of the corporate media by Cheryl Seal, Unknown News
From our files:
Jessica Lynch's rescue in Iraq was mostly mythmaking
From our files:
Is it Pentagon policy to target reporters?
| All republished material is copyrighted by its original publisher.
This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this is a 'fair use' of copyrighted material, as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: www.law.cornell.edu/ uscode/17/107.shtml. |
|
|
|
|
We don't think it's the intent of the corporate-controlled press to destroy America, but their intent hardly matters when that's what they're doing.
A few giant corporations control virtually all newspapers and newscasts in America, and those corporations are frightened of offending readers, viewers, or most importantly, advertisers. So news that might anger the audience never makes the news.
That's why "we the people" know everything about celebrity divorces, and we're all well-informed about missing children and sexual predators on the internet and whatever Michael Jackson's up to -- but we're told almost nothing that might raise an eyebrow about America's leadership.
With the mainstream media's help, almost any lie can seem plausible. A prominent politician says something absurd, and reporters report it "impartially," without pointing out the absurdity, thus making the absurd "serious."
And after just a few years of such 'journalism', here we are in 2006, where what should be seen as obvious outrages -- torture, jailing journalists, abandoning the Geneva Conventions, and non-stop lies from our leaders' lips -- are seen as perfectly acceptable.
--Helen & Harry Highwater, Unknown News
|
|
The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.
--Thomas Jefferson
|
|
















|